Connect with us

Politics

The Prime Minister's approval is a prerequisite for allocating state properties to non-governmental entities

The General Authority for State Properties has proposed a draft set of regulations to govern the allocation and recovery of state properties, applicable to all entities

Published

on

The General Authority for State Properties proposed a draft set of regulations to organize the allocation and recovery of state properties, applicable to all entities requesting allocation and the entities to which the property is allocated, provided that the allocation is done by placing any of the state properties at the disposal of the entity to which it is allocated for its exploitation or benefit.

The draft regulations proposed by the Authority stipulate that state properties may not be allocated to non-governmental entities except with the approval of the Prime Minister, with the exception of entities for which special orders or decisions are issued.

The regulations indicated that a permanent committee would be formed within the Authority by a decision of the Governor, chaired by the Authority, with membership including representatives from the Ministries of Finance, Municipalities and Housing, Environment, Water and Agriculture, Energy, Industry and Mineral Resources, and the Government Spending and Projects Efficiency Authority. The committee would be responsible for considering all matters related to the allocation and recovery of state properties, and submitting a recommendation to the Governor.

The committee may invite whomever it deems appropriate to attend its meetings, and invite a representative of the government entity requesting the allocation to discuss it when necessary, without them having the right to vote or the right to access any confidential information except to the extent that it achieves the purpose of their attendance.

Electronic portal linked to data

According to the regulations, the Authority shall establish an electronic portal for the allocation and recovery of state properties, linked to the state properties databases, to unify the source for receiving applications to ensure that they are not duplicated, and to preserve, update and integrate the data.

The entity requesting the allocation is obligated to develop a plan – in coordination with the Authority – to estimate its future real estate needs for a period of three fiscal years. The plan must include: the region, city, or governorate in which the allocation is to be made, the type of property, its specifications, the purpose of the property, information about the government entity’s employees, such as their numbers, levels, job structure, and any other data requested by the Authority.

The state property whose allocation has been cancelled is recovered by virtue of a report approved by the Authority, signed by a representative of the Authority, which includes its location, and is supported by internal and external photographs.

Preserving and utilizing the property

The Authority, in accordance with the regulations, obligated the entity to which it was allocated to maintain the property, use it for the purpose for which it was allocated, not make any structural modification to the property except after the Authority’s approval, bear all risks that the property may be exposed to during the allocation period, and commit to not building except after obtaining a copy of the deed, completing the licenses, and conducting the studies.

The entity requesting the allocation must submit the allocation request through the portal, attaching a brief report on the targeted activity, estimates of employees, beneficiaries of the activity, the initial plan of the project elements, the required area, and a statement of other state properties allocated to the same entity, in the same city or governorate. If 60 days have passed since the request was returned to the entity requesting the allocation for correction or completion of documents, without a response with the correction or the required data, the request shall be considered as if it never existed.

The Authority may allocate state property to more than one government entity. Property is considered shared if they are surrounded by one wall, or are grouped together in one building, or share public services such as electricity, water, and sewage, or share in operation, maintenance, cleaning, and security guard contracts.

The Authority shall supervise the joint properties, and the Authority may, in order to achieve a temporary public interest, allocate a property or part of it to another entity for a period not exceeding three years from the date of issuance of the decision.

Allocation according to the needs plan

The regulations stressed that no state property should be allocated to entities except in accordance with a needs assessment plan, with the condition that the entity requesting the allocation does not have an unutilized property that meets its needs, and that the area of ​​the property to be allocated is consistent with the standards adopted by the Authority in coordination with the relevant regulatory bodies, and within the limits of the needs of the entity requesting the allocation.

The Authority may allocate the property to the entity requesting allocation without being bound by the plan in the following cases: if the government entity was established after the start of the fiscal year, and if circumstances arose for the entity that were not expected when the plan was submitted and approved, after the Authority’s approval, and in the case of temporary allocation of properties, or any other case determined by the Authority.

The state property to be allocated must be in accordance with the approved city plans, be vacant and not exploited by the entity to which it is allocated, have no existing dispute, be free of third-party rights, and no part of the land shall be allocated except after it has been planned. If it has not been planned, a land division plan shall be prepared for it. It is also required for the allocation of buildings that they be free of structural defects.

Evaluation and value of the land and building

Before allocating real estate, the Authority ensures that the property has been appraised by a qualified appraiser. If no appraisal exists, the Authority appraises the real estate before allocating it. The appraisal includes determining the value of the land and the value of the building separately, and this is included in the allocation decision. The Authority notifies the Ministry of Finance of the appraisal report. The Authority re-appraises the real estate if there are substantial indicators of a decline in its value. The allocated property is handed over in accordance with a report approved by the Authority, signed by a representative of the Authority and the entity to which it is allocated, and supported by internal and external photographs.

It stipulated that if the entity allocated the property wishes to dispense with it, it must notify the Authority within a period of no less than six months, attaching a copy of the title deed, an approved survey map, and a detailed technical report supported by internal and external photographs showing the location of the building, its structural, architectural, electrical and mechanical condition, building areas and fence lengths, in addition to a financial clearance for the obligations related to the property, such as electricity and water.

The regulations stipulate that the property must be returned to the Authority if the project is not started within three years of receipt, or if an excuse is provided explaining the reason for the delay in utilizing the property. The regulations also stipulate the obligation to return the excess of the allocated area after the project is completed, and to submit an annual report to the Authority that includes proof of the property's condition, any modifications made to it, the areas utilized, and the nature of the property's utilization activity.

Protecting integrity and combating corruption

Legal advisor and lawyer Obaid Al-Ayafi confirmed that the regulations for organizing the allocation and recovery of state properties apply to all entities requesting allocation if approved. They aim to establish the necessary procedures to prove state ownership of all its properties, and to develop an integrated database for state properties, including recording all changes and transactions that occur to the properties.

He explained that these rules protect integrity, promote the principle of transparency, and combat financial and administrative corruption in all its forms, manifestations, and methods.

Al-Ayafi explained that the Authority undertakes all tasks and responsibilities related to state real estate affairs and the disposal of state real estate, including investment, allocation, leasing, and meeting the needs of government agencies for land, buildings, and other types of disposal.

He stressed that this comes in accordance with the orders, regulations and instructions regulating this, and this does not affect the Authority’s ability to meet the needs of government agencies for those properties.

Establishing state ownership of its properties

Lawyer Al-Ayafi said: “The tasks of the General Authority for State Properties include setting general policies related to state property affairs, and the plans and programs necessary for their implementation. It is also among its tasks to set the necessary procedures to establish state ownership of all its properties, and to issue deeds for state properties in the name of state properties.”.

He explained that one of the most important tasks of the Authority is to develop mechanisms that ensure integration and coordination between the government agencies concerned with state real estate affairs, enabling them to carry out the tasks assigned to them, resolve any disputes between them, monitor the application of the regulations, rules and instructions related to state real estate affairs, and preserve the original deeds and ownership documents of state real estate.

The Saudi News Network first launched on Twitter via its official account, @SaudiNews50, and quickly became one of the Kingdom's leading independent news sources, thanks to its fast and reliable coverage of major local and international events. Due to the growing trust of its followers, the network expanded by launching its website, a comprehensive news platform offering regularly updated content in the fields of politics, economics, health, education, and national events, presented in a professional style that meets the public's expectations. The network strives to enhance public awareness and provide accurate information in a timely manner through on-the-ground reporting, in-depth analysis, and a specialized editorial team, making it a trusted source for anyone seeking up-to-the-minute Saudi news.

Politics

Washington returns oil tanker to Venezuela: Will sanctions policy change?

The United States has decided to return the giant oil tanker 'Sophia' to Venezuela, in a move that raises questions about the future of the maximum pressure and sanctions policy on Caracas.

Published

on

Washington returns oil tanker to Venezuela: Will sanctions policy change?

In a significant development amid ongoing tensions between Washington and Caracas, two US officials revealed the United States' intention to return a giant oil tanker it seized earlier this month to Venezuelan authorities. According to Reuters, the officials confirmed that the tanker in question is the "Sophia," a Panamanian-flagged supertanker, raising questions about the dynamics of US pressure tactics.

Background of sanctions and maximum pressure policy

This move comes against the backdrop of the “maximum pressure” campaign imposed on Venezuela by the previous US administration under Donald Trump, a campaign that lasted for years with the aim of overthrowing the government of President Nicolás Maduro. This campaign included imposing harsh economic sanctions primarily targeting the oil sector, the lifeblood of the Venezuelan economy. Through these measures, Washington sought to cut off Maduro’s government’s sources of revenue and bolster the political opposition.

Targeting oil tankers: A US strategy

The seizure of oil tankers linked to Venezuela has been a key part of this strategy. Since late last year, the United States has intensified its efforts to confiscate Venezuelan oil shipments on the high seas, successfully seizing at least seven tankers. These operations aim to prevent Venezuela from exporting its crude oil or importing refined products, further isolating it economically. Former US President Donald Trump has previously hinted at broader plans to control Venezuelan oil resources, proposing a $100 billion investment plan to rebuild the country's crumbling oil sector after regime change.

The importance of re-carrying the tanker and its potential impact

The decision to return the tanker Sofia is an unexpected development that could point to several possibilities. It may stem from legal challenges faced by US authorities in proving the tanker's violation of sanctions, or it may reflect a tactical shift in Washington's policy. Domestically, in Venezuela, the return of a single tanker does little to alter the grim picture of the country's collapsing oil sector, but it could represent a symbolic victory for the Maduro government. Internationally, this move could be interpreted as a small gesture that might open channels for future dialogue, or simply as a reflection of the legal and practical complexities of enforcing a broad maritime sanctions regime. The situation remains complex, as Washington continues its overall policy toward Venezuela, while such exceptional cases add a new layer of uncertainty to the future of relations between the two countries.

Continue Reading

Politics

Saudi Arabia denies rumors of refusing to receive Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed

Information Minister Salman Al-Dossari confirms that what is being said about the Kingdom refusing to receive Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed is untrue, stressing the depth of the brotherly relations between the two countries.

Published

on

Saudi Arabia denies rumors of refusing to receive Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed

Saudi Minister of Information, Mr. Salman bin Yousef Al-Dossari, categorically confirmed that the news circulating on some media platforms and social media about the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia refusing to receive His Highness Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, National Security Advisor of the United Arab Emirates, is completely false and has no relation to reality.

In a statement aimed at dispelling rumors, Minister Al-Dossari clarified that Sheikh Tahnoon's relationship with the Kingdom transcends official protocols, emphasizing that "Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed comes to the Kingdom whenever he wishes without prior notice; it is his home and its leadership is his family." This statement reflects the depth of the personal and fraternal ties that bind the leadership of the two brotherly countries and puts an end to any attempt to cast doubt on the strength of this relationship.

Historical context of established relations

These rumors come at a time when Saudi-Emirati relations are at their strongest and most robust, with the strategic partnership between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi representing a cornerstone of stability in the Gulf region and the Middle East. This historic relationship is based on a long legacy of joint cooperation and coordination at the highest levels across various political, economic, and security fields, within the framework of the Gulf Cooperation Council and through advanced bilateral mechanisms such as the Saudi-Emirati Coordination Council, which aims to integrate visions and interests.

The importance of the event and its regional impact

His Highness Sheikh Tahnoun bin Zayed Al Nahyan is a pivotal figure in the UAE, holding the sensitive strategic position of National Security Advisor and playing a prominent role in shaping his country's foreign and economic policies. Given his position and the nature of the portfolios he oversees, his visits to the Kingdom and his meetings with Saudi officials carry particular significance. These visits are part of ongoing consultations and close coordination to address shared regional challenges and strengthen mutual interests. The aim of spreading such false information is to undermine trust and disrupt the robust alliance between the two countries, an alliance that has proven its effectiveness in dealing with numerous regional crises. Therefore, the swift and official Saudi denial underscores that this strategic relationship is immune to attempts to sow discord, and that communication channels between the two leaderships remain open, transparent, and characterized by absolute trust. This stance demonstrates the awareness of both countries regarding the importance of protecting their partnership from misleading media campaigns that target the security and stability of the entire region.

Continue Reading

Politics

Putin and Sharaa in Moscow: The future of Russian-Syrian relations

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Syrian interim Prime Minister Ahmed al-Sharaa discussed the future of bilateral relations, the fate of Russian forces, and reconstruction in Moscow.

Published

on

Putin and Sharaa in Moscow: The future of Russian-Syrian relations

A strategic meeting in the Kremlin shapes the future

In a highly significant diplomatic move, Russian President Vladimir Putin received Syrian interim Prime Minister Ahmed al-Sharaa at the Kremlin on Wednesday. This meeting, the first of its kind since the recent radical political changes in Damascus, focused on the prospects for bilateral relations, the future of the Russian military presence in Syria, and the complex situation in the Middle East.

Historical background: From supporting the previous regime to engaging in dialogue with the new reality

This meeting is taking place against the backdrop of a historic shift in Syria, marked by the collapse of Bashar al-Assad's regime, whose most prominent international backer was Moscow. Since its military intervention in 2015, Russia has played a decisive role in tipping the balance of the conflict in favor of the former regime, establishing strategic military bases in Hmeimim and Tartus. Today, Putin's dialogue with al-Sharaa represents a pragmatic shift in Russian policy, an acknowledgment of the new reality on the ground, and an effort by Moscow to preserve its strategic interests and influence in Syria and the region.

The importance of the meeting and its potential effects

The meeting is of paramount importance to both sides. For the new Syrian government, this visit is a vital step toward gaining international legitimacy and securing the support of a major world power during the reconstruction and stabilization phase. For Russia, the goal is to ensure the continuity of its security and economic interests, safeguard the future of its military bases, and solidify its role as an indispensable mediator in any future political settlement in Syria.

Topics of discussion: From the economy to the military presence

During the meeting, President Putin praised al-Sharaa's efforts to develop relations, emphasizing the success in raising the level of economic cooperation between the two countries. Putin expressed a clear desire for Russian companies, particularly in the construction sector, to play a pivotal role in the reconstruction of Syria, which represents an economic opportunity for Moscow to recoup the costs of its military intervention. For his part, al-Sharaa commended Russia's role in achieving stability, expressing his hope that the Middle East region would witness a new phase of development and prosperity, and noting the numerous commonalities between Damascus and Moscow upon which further cooperation could be built.

The future of the Russian military presence was expected to feature prominently in the discussions, as the new Syrian government seeks to redefine its relationship with foreign forces on its territory, while Russia aims to secure an agreement that guarantees its long-term strategic presence.

Continue Reading

Trending News