Connect with us

Politics

Trump-Harris "bone-crushing" election

We are about four months away from the moment of truth in the US presidential elections; on January 2nd

Published

on

We are about four months away from the moment of truth in the US presidential elections. On January 2nd, the new US president, whether Republican or Democrat, will stand to take the oath during a massive ceremony and set the features of American policy, which is perhaps the biggest moment in world politics.

But this historic moment will only come after a heated, breathtaking war between the two giant parties (Republican and Democratic).

There is a clear mix-up in the American elections, which carries a kind of division, as we see Republicans aligning with Democrats, and figures who do not belong to the Republican Party fighting against the Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. This is a new war in the United States of America.

Last Tuesday, Donald Trump’s campaign said that the Republican presidential candidate had added Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard, who had been seeking to run for president, to his transition team, to join him if he wins the election scheduled for next November. Notably, neither Kennedy nor Gabbard belong to the Republican Party.

Trump’s aim behind this approach is to expand the circle of American alliances as far as possible to cover up the octopus of the Democrats, who appear more cohesive. This is what prompted Brian Hughes, a senior advisor in the Trump campaign, to say in a statement: “With the expansion of the great coalition of supporters of President Trump beyond the limits of the (Republican) Party supporters, we are honored to add Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard to the Trump/Vance transition team.”.

Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman who ran for president on the Democratic ticket in 2020 but was unsuccessful, has a burning desire to take revenge on the Democratic Party. So she found the best revenge against the Democrats was to join the campaign of the opposing candidate, and that is what actually happened. Such practices indicate the severity of the American political division, as personal whims have become more prominent than partisan and national interests. Such a level of thinking was not previously seen in the midst of American elections.

But wait; this is not a victory for the Republican candidate Donald Trump. There are other events that reflect the American interference in these elections, which again points to the depth of the contradictions, conflict, and perhaps even a hot war within these elections.

While Trump’s campaign attracted prominent Democratic and other political figures, more than 200 Republicans who had worked with former President George Bush, the late Senator John McCain, and Senator Mitt Romney announced their support for the presidential campaign of current Vice President Kamala Harris.

The statement issued by these figures via NBC comes after several Republicans who criticize Trump made statements in support of Harris during the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in the middle of last month.

In the letter, first reported by USA Today, these figures indicated that they had declared their opposition to Trump during the 2020 election cycle, and said they jointly announced that they would vote for Vice President Kamala Harris and Governor Tim Walz in November.

This is not an ordinary election at all. This is a (crucial) election between two long-established parties in the United States, each with its own project at the American level and at the international level, and such an election will certainly change the face of the world after 2024.

Although the election race is still underway and the outcome remains uncertain, American polls, which are often considered reliable, are revealing new data. A poll published by Morning Consult showed Democratic candidate Harris leading her Republican rival Trump, and even widening her lead over the former president. The poll surveyed approximately 8,000 likely voters, with 48% supporting Harris and 44% saying they would vote for her opponent, Trump.

Although American opinion polls play a role in determining the behavior of voters, especially those who are undecided, these polls remain a preliminary gauge of the pulse in the American case, and the media and research arms of the Democrats usually outperform the Republicans in election battles.

One day, former US President Bill Clinton was asked about the policies of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, and his answer was: There is no such thing as party policy, there is only one American policy, and there are Republican and Democratic tools! This American political philosophy is outdated. Today, there is a clear and heated war between the two parties and between two projects at the American and global levels. Therefore, it can be said that this election is the most expensive election in the world on the political, economic, and even social levels, due to the clear statements of the two projects, the Democratic and the Republican, which are no longer a secret at the American and international levels.

What is happening today in the United States is mostly not a conflict over American national interest as it was in previous presidential elections, but rather a conflict between the center and the periphery; the center is Washington and the periphery is America’s shadow in the world, in the Middle East, in Russia and in many regions that are watching who will govern the Oval Office. Therefore, we do not rule out at all international interventions by both parties, because the next stage is the stage of drawing the new world.

The moment the United States of America declares the presidential candidate the winner of the election is zero hour in this world that is still stuck in the pocket of the United States of America.

The Saudi News Network first launched on Twitter via its official account, @SaudiNews50, and quickly became one of the Kingdom's leading independent news sources, thanks to its fast and reliable coverage of major local and international events. Due to the growing trust of its followers, the network expanded by launching its website, a comprehensive news platform offering regularly updated content in the fields of politics, economics, health, education, and national events, presented in a professional style that meets the public's expectations. The network strives to enhance public awareness and provide accurate information in a timely manner through on-the-ground reporting, in-depth analysis, and a specialized editorial team, making it a trusted source for anyone seeking up-to-the-minute Saudi news.

Politics

Arabian Gulf Security Exercise 4: Enhancing security cooperation to counter threats

The “Arabian Gulf Security 4” exercise was launched in Qatar with specialized Saudi participation, with the aim of raising readiness and enhancing joint action among the Gulf Cooperation Council countries to confront security threats.

Published

on

Arabian Gulf Security Exercise 4: Enhancing security cooperation to counter threats

Colonel Dr. Ali Al-Qahtani, commander of the Saudi force participating in the “Arabian Gulf Security 4” exercise hosted by Qatar, affirmed that the exercise aims to counter potential threats and enhance regional security. Al-Qahtani explained that the Kingdom is participating with a specialized security force from the Ministry of Interior and the Presidency of State Security, reflecting the strategic importance Riyadh places on strengthening joint security efforts among the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries.

Background and context of the exercise

The “Arabian Gulf Security 4” exercise comes as a new link in a series of joint security exercises whose first version was launched in the Kingdom of Bahrain in 2016, followed by the second version in the United Arab Emirates in 2019, and then the third version in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 2022. These periodic exercises are an embodiment of the security agreements between the GCC countries, and aim to unify concepts, coordinate efforts and raise the level of joint field work between the security agencies in the member states, thus ensuring a rapid and unified response to any security emergency.

Importance and strategic objectives

The exercise's objectives extend beyond routine training, focusing on developing security cooperation mechanisms, enhancing combat readiness, and exchanging expertise to address complex and emerging security threats. These threats include counterterrorism, transnational organized crime, cybersecurity, and securing vital infrastructure and maritime facilities. Through realistic scenarios, the exercise hones the participating forces' skills in command and control, operational management, and intelligence coordination, thereby strengthening their ability to operate as a cohesive and integrated force.

Regional and international impact

The timing of this exercise sends a clear message about the unity and solidarity of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states in the face of regional challenges. The high-level attendance at the opening ceremony, including Qatari Undersecretary of the Ministry of Interior Abdullah Al-Kaabi, Assistant Secretary-General for Security Affairs at the GCC Secretariat Brigadier General Hamad Ajlan Al-Amimi, and Chairman of the Saudi Joint Force Committee Major General Awad Al-Anzi, reflects the shared political will to support regional stability. This security cooperation not only protects the security of the GCC states but also extends to securing vital waterways and stabilizing global energy markets, making it of international importance.

The launch of the “Arabian Gulf Security 4” exercise is a significant strategic step to strengthen the collective security system of the Gulf states and affirms their readiness to deal with various potential scenarios and threats. The exercise represents a vital platform for exchanging expertise and developing capabilities, serving the security and stability of the region and its people.

Continue Reading

Politics

The Security Council ends the mandate of the United Nations Mission in Hodeidah (UNMHA)

By a majority vote, the Security Council ended the mandate of the UN Mission in Yemen (UNMHA). Learn about the background of the decision and its impact on the Hodeidah Agreement and the future of the peace process.

Published

on

The Security Council ends the mandate of the United Nations Mission in Hodeidah (UNMHA)

The UN Security Council announced its decision to end the mandate of the UN Mission to Support the Hodeidah Agreement (UNMHA) by the end of March, a move reflecting the significant challenges facing peace efforts in Yemen. The decision was adopted by a vote of 13 in favor out of 15 members, with Russia and China abstaining, indicating a division in international views on managing the Yemeni crisis.

Background to the establishment of the mission and the Stockholm Agreement

The United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Yemen (UNMHA) was established in early 2019 as a key component of the Stockholm Agreement reached in December 2018 between the Yemeni government and the Houthi movement. The agreement's primary objective was to establish a ceasefire in the city of Hodeidah and its vital ports (Hodeidah, Salif, and Ras Isa), which serve as a crucial lifeline for humanitarian aid to millions of Yemenis. UNMHA was mandated to monitor the implementation of the agreement, including overseeing the ceasefire and the redeployment of forces from the ports and the city, and facilitating humanitarian operations.

Reasons for ending the mandate and its impact

The decision to end the mission, included in Resolution 2813 drafted by Britain, comes amid the stalled implementation of the Hodeidah Agreement. The US Deputy Ambassador to the Security Council, Tammy Bruce, directly stated that “the Houthis’ intransigence has rendered the mission ineffective,” arguing that its continuation was no longer worthwhile in the absence of progress. This decision coincides with escalating regional tensions, particularly Houthi attacks in the Red Sea, which have shifted the priorities of the international community and further complicated the already faltering peace efforts.

Transitional phase and future challenges

The resolution provides for a technical extension of the mission's mandate for an additional two months, until the end of March, to allow sufficient time for the orderly conclusion of its operations. During this period, the remaining tasks will be transferred to the Office of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General for Yemen, with the complete liquidation of the mission to begin on April 1. The resolution also requests the Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres, to present a clear and detailed plan for this transition process in consultation with the Yemeni parties.

The termination of UNMHA's mandate raises concerns about the future of the fragile ceasefire in Hodeidah and the potential for renewed military confrontations in this strategic region. It also raises questions about the effectiveness of international mechanisms in managing complex conflicts and places a greater burden on the diplomatic efforts led by the UN envoy to find a comprehensive and sustainable political solution to the crisis in Yemen.

Continue Reading

Politics

The World Bank is providing Lebanon with $350 million to address the crisis

The World Bank has approved $350 million in new funding for Lebanon to support poor families and accelerate digital transformation, in an effort to mitigate the effects of the economic collapse.

Published

on

The World Bank is providing Lebanon with $350 million to address the crisis

The World Bank announced its approval of a new financing package for Lebanon totaling $350 million, a move aimed at mitigating the unprecedented economic crisis gripping the country. The funding is divided into two main tranches: $200 million earmarked for strengthening social safety nets and supporting the poorest families, and $150 million to accelerate the country's digital transformation project.

Context of the stifling economic crisis

This funding comes at a time when Lebanon is experiencing one of the most severe economic and financial crises in modern history, which began to unfold in late 2019. The World Bank itself has ranked this crisis among the three most severe global crises since the mid-19th century. The financial collapse has led to a devaluation of the Lebanese pound by more than 98%, wiping out citizens' savings and pushing more than 80% of the population below the poverty line. The situation was tragically exacerbated by the Beirut port explosion in August 2020, which devastated large parts of the capital and placed an enormous burden on the already strained infrastructure and healthcare sector.

Details of the support package and its objectives

The first tranche of funding, amounting to $200 million, aims to provide direct cash transfers to poor and vulnerable Lebanese families. This support is a lifeline for hundreds of thousands of families struggling to secure their basic needs for food, medicine, and education. The project focuses particularly on empowering women and youth by increasing their economic opportunities and improving their access to essential social services.

The second tranche, valued at $150 million, targets the digital transformation project. This project is of strategic importance given the inefficiencies of public administration and the low quality of government services. Accelerating digitalization is expected to improve the transparency of government transactions, reduce corruption, and facilitate access to public services for citizens and businesses, potentially creating a more favorable environment for economic opportunities and the growth of the technology sector in the country.

Importance and expected impact

At the local level, this funding represents vital, albeit temporary, support that helps prevent the complete collapse of the state and avert a wider humanitarian catastrophe. However, experts agree that it is not a fundamental solution to the crisis. A genuine and sustainable recovery for Lebanon hinges on implementing deep structural reforms, including restructuring the banking sector, implementing a financial recovery plan agreed upon with the International Monetary Fund, and combating the rampant corruption within state institutions.

Regionally and internationally, this move reflects the international community's continued concern about the repercussions of Lebanon's collapse on regional stability, particularly regarding sensitive security issues and the refugee crisis. This support is seen as part of a broader strategy aimed at providing direct humanitarian assistance to the Lebanese people while maintaining pressure on the political class to implement necessary reforms as a prerequisite for future financial support.

Continue Reading

Trending News