Connect with us

Politics

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation condemns the Israeli aggression against Qatar

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation strongly condemns the Israeli aggression against Doha, stressing that it is a threat to regional and international security. Details of the escalation and reactions are in the article.

Published

on

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation condemns the Israeli aggression against Qatar

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation condemns the Israeli aggression against Doha

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) strongly condemned the Israeli attack targeting the Qatari capital, Doha, considering it a flagrant violation of international law, the UN Charter, and international norms. This escalation poses a threat to the region's security and stability and undermines international peace and security.

The organization's reaction and the Qatari position

In an official statement, the Secretary-General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), Hussein Ibrahim Taha, described the attack as a blatant violation of the sovereignty, security, and territorial integrity of the State of Qatar. He affirmed that the OIC categorically rejects any attack on the sovereignty and security of any of its member states. The OIC also expressed its full solidarity with Qatar and its support for its security, stability, and the safety of its citizens and residents.

The organization affirmed its support for all measures taken by Qatar to preserve its security and sovereignty. It called upon the international community and the Security Council to uphold their responsibilities by compelling Israel to cease its ongoing aggression in the region and to abide by international law and resolutions of international legitimacy.

Historical and political context

This incident comes amid escalating tensions in the region, where relations between Israel and Arab states face ongoing challenges. Historically, the Middle East has been an arena for multifaceted conflicts related to sovereignty, borders, and natural resources. Recent years have seen diplomatic efforts to ease tensions through normalization agreements between Israel and some Arab states.

However, the Palestinian issue remains the main point of contention between Israel and the Arab and Islamic states. Such attacks are considered an obstacle to peace efforts and regional stability.

The Saudi position and diplomatic role

Saudi Arabia plays a pivotal role in promoting regional stability through its quiet and balanced diplomacy. In this context, Riyadh supports efforts to find peaceful solutions to existing conflicts and fosters dialogue among various parties to ensure security and stability in the region.

Saudi Arabia’s position is positively demonstrated by its support for international resolutions that seek to end conflicts and build bridges of communication between conflicting countries.

Call for international cooperation

In conclusion, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation emphasizes the need for concerted international efforts to halt the escalation and ensure respect for the national sovereignty of its member states. The international community remains called upon to play an active role in achieving a just and comprehensive peace in the Middle East region that guarantees the rights of all parties and brings about the desired stability for all.

The Saudi News Network first launched on Twitter via its official account, @SaudiNews50, and quickly became one of the Kingdom's leading independent news sources, thanks to its fast and reliable coverage of major local and international events. Due to the growing trust of its followers, the network expanded by launching its website, a comprehensive news platform offering regularly updated content in the fields of politics, economics, health, education, and national events, presented in a professional style that meets the public's expectations. The network strives to enhance public awareness and provide accurate information in a timely manner through on-the-ground reporting, in-depth analysis, and a specialized editorial team, making it a trusted source for anyone seeking up-to-the-minute Saudi news.

Politics

Saudi Arabia and seven other countries condemn the escalation of settlement activity in the West Bank

Saudi Arabia and seven other countries issued a joint statement condemning Israel's classification of lands in the West Bank as "state lands," warning of the undermining of the two-state solution and calling for urgent international intervention.

Published

on

Saudi Arabia and seven other countries condemn the escalation of settlement activity in the West Bank

In a unified diplomatic move reflecting the seriousness of the situation in the occupied Palestinian territories, the foreign ministers of eight countries – the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, the State of Qatar, the Arab Republic of Egypt, the Republic of Turkey, the Republic of Indonesia, and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan – issued a joint statement expressing their strong condemnation of the recent Israeli decisions concerning the Palestinian territories.

Unprecedented escalation of settlement activity since 1967

The ministers condemned in the strongest terms Israel’s move to designate large areas of land in the occupied West Bank as “state land.” The statement noted that these actions include approving the commencement of land registration and settlement procedures, a dangerous step being taken for the first time since the occupation of the West Bank in 1967. The ministers considered this move a flagrant violation of international law and an escalation aimed at legitimizing and expanding settlements at the expense of the rights of the Palestinian people.

Violation of international laws and resolutions

The joint statement affirmed that these measures fundamentally violate international humanitarian law, specifically the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits an occupying power from transferring its own population into the territory it occupies or altering its geographic and demographic character. The ministers also stressed that these practices constitute a blatant challenge to relevant UN Security Council resolutions, foremost among them Resolution 2334, which affirms the illegality of settlements in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem.

In a related context, the ministers pointed out that the Israeli decision contradicts the advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice, which clarified the legal implications of Israeli policies, stressing the illegality of any measures aimed at changing the historical and legal status of the occupied territory, and the need to end the occupation and prohibit the seizure of land by military force.

Risks of undermining the two-state solution

The foreign ministers of the eight countries warned of the political and security repercussions of these steps, emphasizing that they aim to impose a new administrative and legal reality that entrenches permanent Israeli control. They explained that the continued confiscation of land and the accelerated pace of settlement construction effectively undermine the two-state solution and eliminate any political prospect for the establishment of an independent, viable, and geographically contiguous Palestinian state. They cautioned that these policies pose a real threat to the chances of achieving a just and comprehensive peace in the region and exacerbate tension and instability in the Middle East.

A call for the international community to assume its responsibilities

The ministers concluded their statement with a clear call for the international community to take immediate action and fulfill its legal and moral responsibilities. They demanded decisive and clear steps to halt these ongoing violations and ensure Israel's respect for international law. They reaffirmed their full support for the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, foremost among them their right to self-determination, an end to the occupation, and the establishment of their independent state on the June 4, 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, as the only way to achieve lasting stability in the region.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump participates in Iran nuclear talks amid military buildup

Trump announces his indirect participation in the Geneva nuclear talks with Iran, amid US military reinforcements and Iranian drills, and fears of the negotiations failing and resorting to the military option.

Published

on

Trump participates in Iran nuclear talks amid military buildup

In a significant development regarding the complex nuclear issue, US President Donald Trump announced his intention to participate indirectly in the new round of nuclear talks between the United States and Iran, scheduled to begin today, Tuesday, in Geneva, Switzerland. Trump expressed cautious optimism, stating his belief that the leadership in Tehran is genuinely willing to reach an agreement that would end the current impasse.

Historical context and escalating tensions

These talks come at a critical juncture in US-Iranian relations, with the Iranian nuclear program representing one of the most complex issues in international politics for decades. Washington and other Western powers have long sought to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program, while Tehran insists on its right to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. The Geneva round of negotiations is of paramount importance given the historical accumulation of economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure that has shaped the current landscape, making any diplomatic breakthrough a globally significant event.

The military option is on the table

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump described the upcoming talks as “very important.” These political pronouncements coincide with tangible military moves on the ground, as the United States has deployed a second aircraft carrier to the Middle East in a clear message of deterrence. Reports from US officials confirm that the American military is making extensive preparations for a potential protracted military campaign should the diplomatic track fail to achieve its objectives.

Negotiation obstacles and previous strikes

Regarding the chances of success for the negotiations, the US president pointed out that Iran had previously engaged in what he described as difficult negotiations, noting that Tehran had realized the consequences of its hardline stance. He cited the US strikes targeting Iranian nuclear sites last summer, which he said marked a turning point in dealing with the crisis. The talks face a major obstacle: Washington's insistence on halting uranium enrichment within Iranian territory. The US administration considers this a fundamental guarantee against Tehran developing a nuclear weapon, while Iran views it as an infringement on its sovereignty.

Iranian preparations and regional repercussions

In a related development, and in parallel with diplomatic efforts, Iran continues to bolster its domestic preparedness. The Iranian Civil Defense Organization conducted large-scale drills simulating a response to a chemical attack in the Pars Special Economic Zone, an energy hub. These drills are part of broader efforts to enhance readiness to counter any potential threats in the south of the country, an area that houses vital energy facilities.

Observers believe that the results of these talks will not only affect bilateral relations between Washington and Tehran, but will also extend to the stability of the entire Middle East region and global energy markets, given the strategic location of the Arabian Gulf and its importance in global oil supplies.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump participates in Iran nuclear talks amid military buildup

Trump announces his indirect participation in nuclear talks with Iran in Geneva. Washington reinforces its military presence and Tehran conducts military exercises, amid hopes for a new agreement.

Published

on

Trump participates in Iran nuclear talks amid military buildup

In a press statement aboard Air Force One, US President Donald Trump announced his decision to participate indirectly in the crucial round of nuclear talks between the United States and Iran, scheduled to begin Tuesday in Geneva, Switzerland. Trump expressed cautious optimism, affirming his firm belief that Tehran is genuinely interested in reaching an agreement to end the current impasse.

This round of negotiations is of exceptional importance, with the US president describing it as “crucial” for the future of regional and international security. This diplomatic move comes at a highly sensitive time, marked by an unprecedented escalation of military tensions in the Middle East, particularly following recent US military deployments, including the deployment of a second aircraft carrier to the region—a clear message of deterrence coinciding with the diplomatic efforts.

Background to the tension and the negotiating position

In discussing the prospects for success in these talks, Trump recalled the history of negotiations with Tehran, noting that Iran had previously engaged in difficult and complex negotiations. However, he pointed to a change in the situation on the ground, suggesting that the Iranian leadership had realized the consequences of its hardline stance, particularly after the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites last summer, which might push Tehran toward adopting a more pragmatic approach in Geneva.

The talks face significant obstacles, most notably the failure of previous rounds due to Washington's insistence on its primary demand that Tehran halt uranium enrichment activities within Iranian territory. The United States considers this a red line, believing that continued enrichment could enable Iran to develop a nuclear weapon, something the international community seeks to prevent in order to preserve the nuclear non-proliferation regime.

Military preparations and failure scenarios

While attention is focused on the diplomatic talks in Geneva, US officials have revealed that the military option remains firmly on the table. They confirmed that the US military is making extensive preparations for a potential protracted military campaign should the negotiation process fail to achieve its objectives, placing the region at a dangerous crossroads between a diplomatic breakthrough or a full-scale military escalation.

On the other hand, as part of its preparations for all scenarios, the Iranian Civil Defense Organization conducted large-scale drills simulating a response to a chemical attack in the Pars Special Economic Zone. These maneuvers are part of efforts to bolster defense readiness against any potential threats targeting vital installations in the south of the country, reflecting serious concerns about a possible military confrontation should the talks reach an impasse.

The results of these talks will not only affect bilateral relations between Washington and Tehran, but their impact will extend to the stability of global energy markets and regional security in the Middle East, making the world's eyes turn towards Geneva in anticipation of what this crucial round will produce.

Continue Reading

Trending News