Connect with us

Politics

Lebanese Prime Minister: It's time to build a strong state

Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam stressed the need for the legitimate armed forces to have a monopoly on weapons in the country, emphasizing that the time

Published

on

Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam stressed the need for the legitimate armed forces to have a monopoly on weapons in the country, emphasizing that the time has come to build a strong state.

In a speech commemorating the 50th anniversary of the outbreak of the Lebanese Civil War, Salam announced today (Sunday) that he will travel to Damascus tomorrow (Monday) to meet with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa and discuss the fate of Lebanese citizens who have been forcibly disappeared since the Lebanese war, and the presence of the Syrian army in Lebanon.

The Prime Minister reiterated the need for the Lebanese state to regain the trust of its citizens and for them to unite with one another and with their government. He said, "We must learn from the tragedies of war, and the time has come to rebuild our state, a state capable of protecting us through its army.".

Salam added that the government is seeking, through diplomacy, to liberate the points in the south that the Israeli army did not evacuate after the last war with Hezbollah.

Nawaf Salam begins his first official visit to the Syrian capital, Damascus, tomorrow, accompanied by the ministers of foreign affairs, interior, and defense. He will hold official talks with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, in the presence of his delegation.

According to government sources, the visit to Damascus is a foundational step for the next phase, which will include subsequent visits by ministers and security figures to discuss joint and outstanding issues between the two countries.

She stressed that the visit focuses on strengthening and correcting historical relations after the scars that marred them in the previous period, and establishing a correct framework for the relationship based on two sovereign states and non-interference in internal affairs.

The sources revealed that the agenda for discussion includes border control, preventing smuggling, tightening security measures at border crossings, closing illegal crossings, preventing clashes, and keeping pace with the border demarcation process.

The two sides are expected to discuss the issues of Syrian refugees and how to work on their return and provide suitable conditions, the possibility of entering into new investments, and the file of missing Lebanese in Syrian prisons and detention centers.

Related News

The Saudi News Network first launched on Twitter via its official account, @SaudiNews50, and quickly became one of the Kingdom's leading independent news sources, thanks to its fast and reliable coverage of major local and international events. Due to the growing trust of its followers, the network expanded by launching its website, a comprehensive news platform offering regularly updated content in the fields of politics, economics, health, education, and national events, presented in a professional style that meets the public's expectations. The network strives to enhance public awareness and provide accurate information in a timely manner through on-the-ground reporting, in-depth analysis, and a specialized editorial team, making it a trusted source for anyone seeking up-to-the-minute Saudi news.

Politics

Saudi Arabia and seven other countries join the Peace Council to end the conflict in Gaza

Eight major regional countries, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey, welcome a US invitation to join the Peace Council with the aim of achieving a permanent ceasefire and the reconstruction of Gaza.

Published

on

Saudi Arabia and seven other countries join the Peace Council to end the conflict in Gaza

In a significant diplomatic move, the foreign ministers of eight influential regional states—the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Republic of Turkey, the Arab Republic of Egypt, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the Republic of Indonesia, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the State of Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates—welcomed the invitation extended by US President Donald Trump to join the “Peace Council.” These countries announced their joint decision to formally join, and each will begin completing its legal and constitutional procedures to sign the accession documents, thus joining Egypt, Pakistan, and the UAE, which had already announced their acceptance.

Historical background and diplomatic context

This initiative comes in the context of decades of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which has witnessed numerous rounds of negotiations and international mediation efforts that have failed to achieve a lasting solution. The United States has long played the role of the primary mediator in many previous peace attempts. The formation of a council comprising major regional and Islamic powers such as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, and Indonesia represents a significant shift in approach, aiming to build unified international and regional momentum to support the peace process, thus lending any future agreement greater political weight and broader guarantees.

The importance of the alliance and its expected impact

The significance of this alliance lies in the political, economic, and religious weight of the participating states. The presence of pivotal Arab countries such as Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE, Jordan, and Qatar, alongside major non-Arab Islamic powers like Turkey, Pakistan, and Indonesia, sends a powerful message about the broad consensus on the need for a just end to the conflict. This council is expected to contribute to mobilizing the necessary resources to support the reconstruction of Gaza, provide political support for consolidating the ceasefire, and exert concerted diplomatic pressure on the parties involved to commit to a peaceful solution.

Council objectives and commitment to international resolutions

The ministers reaffirmed their countries’ full support for the peace efforts led by President Trump, emphasizing their commitment to supporting the mission of the Peace Council as a transitional body. The Council’s mandate is based on the comprehensive plan to end the conflict in Gaza, as adopted by UN Security Council Resolution 2803. Its main objectives include establishing a permanent ceasefire, overseeing the reconstruction of Gaza’s devastated infrastructure, and, most importantly, advancing a just and lasting peace that fulfills the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination and the establishment of their independent state in accordance with international law and relevant UN resolutions, thereby ensuring security and stability for all peoples and states in the region.

Continue Reading

Politics

The death of Rifaat al-Assad: The end of the 'Butcher of Hama' and his bloody career

Rifaat al-Assad, Bashar al-Assad's uncle, has died at the age of 88. He was known as the "Butcher of Hama" for his role in the 1982 massacre. Learn about his bloody history, his legal troubles, and his fate after the fall of the regime.

Published

on

The death of Rifaat al-Assad: The end of the 'Butcher of Hama' and his bloody career

Rifaat al-Assad, the uncle of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and one of the most prominent and ruthless figures in the decades-long Assad family rule, has died at the age of 88. His death comes shortly after the fall of his nephew's regime in December 2014, bringing to a close the life of a controversial figure whose name is linked to one of the bloodiest chapters in modern Syrian history.

Historical context: The Hama massacre

The name Rifaat al-Assad cannot be mentioned without recalling the events of the 1982 Hama massacre . At the time, Rifaat commanded the Defense Brigades, a semi-autonomous and well-equipped military force whose primary mission was to protect the regime of his brother, Hafez al-Assad. When an armed uprising led by the Muslim Brotherhood erupted in the city of Hama, the Defense Brigades were tasked with suppressing it. The result was a brutal military campaign that lasted for weeks, during which the city was indiscriminately bombarded and its old quarters destroyed, resulting in the deaths of between 10,000 and 40,000 civilians, according to various estimates. This massacre cemented the title "Butcher of Hama," which haunted Rifaat al-Assad until his death.

A power struggle and a long exile

Rifaat's career was not limited to military repression; it was also marked by political ambition. In 1984, after his brother Hafez al-Assad suffered a heart attack, Rifaat attempted a coup to seize power, deploying his forces in the streets of Damascus. However, the attempt failed after their mother intervened, and he was exiled from Syria and nominally appointed vice president, beginning a long period of exile in Europe, moving between France and Spain. During his exile, he amassed a considerable fortune, which raised suspicions that it had been plundered from the Syrian treasury.

Significance and impact: legal proceedings and a symbolic end

Internationally, Rifaat al-Assad faced legal proceedings in several European countries. In France, he was convicted of money laundering and embezzling Syrian public funds, receiving a prison sentence and the confiscation of his luxury real estate holdings. Swiss authorities also opened an investigation against him for alleged war crimes related to his role in the Hama massacre. These prosecutions represented a significant symbol in the effort to achieve justice for the victims and hold those responsible for major crimes accountable.

Rifaat al-Assad unexpectedly returned to Syria in 2021, fleeing a prison sentence in France. His stay was short-lived, however. With the collapse of the Assad regime in December 2024, he left the country again, reportedly traveling to the United Arab Emirates via Lebanon. His death today, while still at large, marks the biological end of a symbol of repression, but it also leaves a bitter taste in the mouths of thousands of Syrians who had hoped to see him face justice in a Syrian court for the crimes he is accused of.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump and European policies: Criticism of clean energy and mass immigration

An analysis of Donald Trump’s statements criticizing Europe’s clean energy and immigration policies, highlighting the background of “America First” and its potential impact.

Published

on

Trump and European policies: Criticism of clean energy and mass immigration

Former US President Donald Trump renewed his criticism of European policies, asserting that the continent is “not headed in the right direction.” He attributed this primarily to what he described as an excessive focus on clean energy and mass immigration policies, which he believes have harmed its economic and security stability. These remarks are part of his ongoing “America First” political discourse, which he repeatedly presented at prominent international forums such as the World Economic Forum in Davos during his presidency.

Historical background and context of “America First”

These criticisms stem from the core political doctrine Trump adopted during his 2016 presidential campaign and throughout his presidency. His foreign policy was based on the premise that traditional alliances and international agreements no longer adequately served American interests. In this context, he criticized NATO allies for failing to meet their financial commitments and withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement, arguing that environmental regulations harmed American industry and gave other countries a competitive advantage. His view of Europe was heavily influenced by this perspective, as he considered its environmental and social policies overly idealistic and unrealistic.

Criticism of energy and immigration policies

Regarding energy, Trump has consistently criticized Europe's, and particularly Germany's, reliance on Russian gas, coupled with its gradual shift away from nuclear power and coal. He argued that this move toward "clean energy" has made Europe dependent on external and unstable energy sources, presenting the United States as a reliable alternative through exports of liquefied natural gas and oil. On immigration, he strongly condemned the "open-door" policies adopted by some European countries, such as Germany in 2015, deeming them a threat to national security and cultural identity, and linking them to increased crime and terrorism.

Importance and expected impact

Trump’s statements take on particular significance given the possibility of his return to the White House. Domestically, they aim to rally his electoral base, which shares his skepticism toward globalization and liberal policies. Internationally, they are causing concern in European capitals, which fear a return to the trade and political tensions that characterized his first term. A potential Trump victory could prompt Europe to reassess its defense and economic strategies and accelerate its efforts toward greater “strategic independence” in energy and defense, in anticipation of a more isolationist and unpredictable US policy.

Continue Reading

Trending News