Politics
Lebanon faces two choices: peace based on national identity or war based on sectarian loyalty
The Lebanese crisis file does not require experts in politics and regional conflicts, nor consultants in economics and geography
The Lebanese crisis file does not need experts in politics and regional conflicts, nor consultants in economics, geography and history, as much as it needs sovereign decisions, and patriotic statesmen who are not beholden to personal interests, and do not follow agendas and dictates that have no connection to the supreme national interests.
Lebanon needs statesmen who are infallible in their hands, who cleanse their country of the dust of battles, and replace the human tools of destruction with intelligent minds that keep pace with the times and are armed with the tools of renewal and construction.
Lebanon was never a cradle of backwardness and fossilized minds. Lebanon is the Paris of the East. How did they turn it into a land of proxy wars and false slogans? Lebanon will not return to its people and its Arab identity unless it gets rid of the old legacy and all those who wreaked havoc on the land, those who share the spoils and distribute loyalties, amidst a crushed people.
I am not well-versed in politics, but the scene does not need a dream interpreter. If you open the file of the crisis, and proceed through the series of conflicts that recorded unprecedented historical events, and occupied the corridors of international organizations and bodies, more than our main issue, the issue of the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Imagine the more than 76 international resolutions issued by the Security Council on this issue, all calling for Lebanon to be left alone, for the warring factions to withdraw from its territory, for it to extend its sovereignty over all its land, and for it to assume full administrative and military control. Foremost among these resolutions are Resolutions 425 and 426, issued in 1978, which explicitly called for the Israeli occupation to withdraw from southern Lebanon and for the establishment of an international protection force called UNIFIL. The crisis did not end there after the occupation's withdrawal; rather, an internal power struggle erupted, and the three branches of government became divided over the Syrian presence. It was then that the UN Security Council issued Resolution 1559 on September 2, 2004, focusing on international peace and security, preserving Lebanon's sovereignty and stability, and calling for the withdrawal of foreign forces (here, the resolution referred to Syrian forces). The resolution also reiterated demands for the disarmament of militias (Hezbollah) and the holding of fair elections, free from sectarian quotas. Foreign Ministry.
Returning to the last page of the crisis, which is the summary of the file, it was linked to two resolutions (1559 and 1701) around which the dispute revolved, between those who supported implementing them together, and those who demanded that they be divided.
Resolution 1701, adopted in August 2006, calls for the full implementation of the provisions of the Taif Agreement and Resolutions 1559 and 1680, including that all Lebanese groups and militias hand over their weapons to the government, and that no foreign forces be allowed to be present except with the government’s consent, and its content revolves around “resolving the Lebanese-Israeli conflict.”.
After the recent crisis between Hezbollah and Israel, the issue of implementing Resolutions 1559 and 1701 resurfaced as a key factor in restoring calm to southern Lebanon. However, in the absence of legitimate authority, politicians split into two camps, each according to its own interests, affiliations, and references, leaving the country's interest behind them. One camp rallied behind their ally (the Party of Satan), supporting the need to separate Resolution 1559, which calls for the disarmament of the planted militias, from Resolution 1701. Meanwhile, the other camp, with a more patriotic perspective, insisted on adhering to the interconnectedness and simultaneity of implementing all international resolutions.
In plain Arabic, here “the sheikh’s donkey stopped at the obstacle”... So, is the picture clear now? Resolution 1559, in its content, is an explicit call to dissolve Lebanese and non-Lebanese militias and hand over their weapons, in addition to extending the authority of the state over all Lebanese territory, while Resolution 1701 included the necessity of implementing Resolution 1559 and Resolution 1680, as well as referring to the Taif Agreement and the National Reconciliation Document.
These decisions, along with the Taif Agreement and the National Reconciliation Document, are considered one and the same, and cannot be separated or prioritized. Therefore, the Lebanese must choose between the peace of belonging to the identity, or the war of loyalty to sectarianism.
Politics
Arabian Gulf Security Exercise 4: Enhancing security cooperation to counter threats
The “Arabian Gulf Security 4” exercise was launched in Qatar with specialized Saudi participation, with the aim of raising readiness and enhancing joint action among the Gulf Cooperation Council countries to confront security threats.
Colonel Dr. Ali Al-Qahtani, commander of the Saudi force participating in the “Arabian Gulf Security 4” exercise hosted by Qatar, affirmed that the exercise aims to counter potential threats and enhance regional security. Al-Qahtani explained that the Kingdom is participating with a specialized security force from the Ministry of Interior and the Presidency of State Security, reflecting the strategic importance Riyadh places on strengthening joint security efforts among the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries.
Background and context of the exercise
The “Arabian Gulf Security 4” exercise comes as a new link in a series of joint security exercises whose first version was launched in the Kingdom of Bahrain in 2016, followed by the second version in the United Arab Emirates in 2019, and then the third version in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 2022. These periodic exercises are an embodiment of the security agreements between the GCC countries, and aim to unify concepts, coordinate efforts and raise the level of joint field work between the security agencies in the member states, thus ensuring a rapid and unified response to any security emergency.
Importance and strategic objectives
The exercise's objectives extend beyond routine training, focusing on developing security cooperation mechanisms, enhancing combat readiness, and exchanging expertise to address complex and emerging security threats. These threats include counterterrorism, transnational organized crime, cybersecurity, and securing vital infrastructure and maritime facilities. Through realistic scenarios, the exercise hones the participating forces' skills in command and control, operational management, and intelligence coordination, thereby strengthening their ability to operate as a cohesive and integrated force.
Regional and international impact
The timing of this exercise sends a clear message about the unity and solidarity of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states in the face of regional challenges. The high-level attendance at the opening ceremony, including Qatari Undersecretary of the Ministry of Interior Abdullah Al-Kaabi, Assistant Secretary-General for Security Affairs at the GCC Secretariat Brigadier General Hamad Ajlan Al-Amimi, and Chairman of the Saudi Joint Force Committee Major General Awad Al-Anzi, reflects the shared political will to support regional stability. This security cooperation not only protects the security of the GCC states but also extends to securing vital waterways and stabilizing global energy markets, making it of international importance.
The launch of the “Arabian Gulf Security 4” exercise is a significant strategic step to strengthen the collective security system of the Gulf states and affirms their readiness to deal with various potential scenarios and threats. The exercise represents a vital platform for exchanging expertise and developing capabilities, serving the security and stability of the region and its people.
Politics
The Security Council ends the mandate of the United Nations Mission in Hodeidah (UNMHA)
By a majority vote, the Security Council ended the mandate of the UN Mission in Yemen (UNMHA). Learn about the background of the decision and its impact on the Hodeidah Agreement and the future of the peace process.
The UN Security Council announced its decision to end the mandate of the UN Mission to Support the Hodeidah Agreement (UNMHA) by the end of March, a move reflecting the significant challenges facing peace efforts in Yemen. The decision was adopted by a vote of 13 in favor out of 15 members, with Russia and China abstaining, indicating a division in international views on managing the Yemeni crisis.
Background to the establishment of the mission and the Stockholm Agreement
The United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Yemen (UNMHA) was established in early 2019 as a key component of the Stockholm Agreement reached in December 2018 between the Yemeni government and the Houthi movement. The agreement's primary objective was to establish a ceasefire in the city of Hodeidah and its vital ports (Hodeidah, Salif, and Ras Isa), which serve as a crucial lifeline for humanitarian aid to millions of Yemenis. UNMHA was mandated to monitor the implementation of the agreement, including overseeing the ceasefire and the redeployment of forces from the ports and the city, and facilitating humanitarian operations.
Reasons for ending the mandate and its impact
The decision to end the mission, included in Resolution 2813 drafted by Britain, comes amid the stalled implementation of the Hodeidah Agreement. The US Deputy Ambassador to the Security Council, Tammy Bruce, directly stated that “the Houthis’ intransigence has rendered the mission ineffective,” arguing that its continuation was no longer worthwhile in the absence of progress. This decision coincides with escalating regional tensions, particularly Houthi attacks in the Red Sea, which have shifted the priorities of the international community and further complicated the already faltering peace efforts.
Transitional phase and future challenges
The resolution provides for a technical extension of the mission's mandate for an additional two months, until the end of March, to allow sufficient time for the orderly conclusion of its operations. During this period, the remaining tasks will be transferred to the Office of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General for Yemen, with the complete liquidation of the mission to begin on April 1. The resolution also requests the Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres, to present a clear and detailed plan for this transition process in consultation with the Yemeni parties.
The termination of UNMHA's mandate raises concerns about the future of the fragile ceasefire in Hodeidah and the potential for renewed military confrontations in this strategic region. It also raises questions about the effectiveness of international mechanisms in managing complex conflicts and places a greater burden on the diplomatic efforts led by the UN envoy to find a comprehensive and sustainable political solution to the crisis in Yemen.
Politics
The World Bank is providing Lebanon with $350 million to address the crisis
The World Bank has approved $350 million in new funding for Lebanon to support poor families and accelerate digital transformation, in an effort to mitigate the effects of the economic collapse.
The World Bank announced its approval of a new financing package for Lebanon totaling $350 million, a move aimed at mitigating the unprecedented economic crisis gripping the country. The funding is divided into two main tranches: $200 million earmarked for strengthening social safety nets and supporting the poorest families, and $150 million to accelerate the country's digital transformation project.
Context of the stifling economic crisis
This funding comes at a time when Lebanon is experiencing one of the most severe economic and financial crises in modern history, which began to unfold in late 2019. The World Bank itself has ranked this crisis among the three most severe global crises since the mid-19th century. The financial collapse has led to a devaluation of the Lebanese pound by more than 98%, wiping out citizens' savings and pushing more than 80% of the population below the poverty line. The situation was tragically exacerbated by the Beirut port explosion in August 2020, which devastated large parts of the capital and placed an enormous burden on the already strained infrastructure and healthcare sector.
Details of the support package and its objectives
The first tranche of funding, amounting to $200 million, aims to provide direct cash transfers to poor and vulnerable Lebanese families. This support is a lifeline for hundreds of thousands of families struggling to secure their basic needs for food, medicine, and education. The project focuses particularly on empowering women and youth by increasing their economic opportunities and improving their access to essential social services.
The second tranche, valued at $150 million, targets the digital transformation project. This project is of strategic importance given the inefficiencies of public administration and the low quality of government services. Accelerating digitalization is expected to improve the transparency of government transactions, reduce corruption, and facilitate access to public services for citizens and businesses, potentially creating a more favorable environment for economic opportunities and the growth of the technology sector in the country.
Importance and expected impact
At the local level, this funding represents vital, albeit temporary, support that helps prevent the complete collapse of the state and avert a wider humanitarian catastrophe. However, experts agree that it is not a fundamental solution to the crisis. A genuine and sustainable recovery for Lebanon hinges on implementing deep structural reforms, including restructuring the banking sector, implementing a financial recovery plan agreed upon with the International Monetary Fund, and combating the rampant corruption within state institutions.
Regionally and internationally, this move reflects the international community's continued concern about the repercussions of Lebanon's collapse on regional stability, particularly regarding sensitive security issues and the refugee crisis. This support is seen as part of a broader strategy aimed at providing direct humanitarian assistance to the Lebanese people while maintaining pressure on the political class to implement necessary reforms as a prerequisite for future financial support.
-
Local News 3 days agoLandslide in Riyadh: Details of the incident in Al-Sahafa neighborhood and containment efforts
-
Local News 4 days agoThe death penalty was carried out against a citizen who stabbed another to death in Tabuk
-
Culture and Art, 1 week agoRamez Galal in Ramadan 2026: Details of the bloody prank show
-
Local News 5 days agoFirst birth on the Riyadh train: A heartwarming story at Andalus station
-
Local News 3 days agoRiyadh collapse: Emergency plans to secure water after a main pipeline burst
-
Culture and Art 3 days agoHaifa Wehbe's absence in Riyadh: A photo crisis or a strained relationship with the media?
-
Culture and Art 3 days agoCity Kitchen series: A drama of conflict and the middle class during Ramadan
-
Culture and Art 3 days agoThe series "Kasra": Dawood Hussein in a moving social drama this Ramadan
