Politics
The Islamic Alliance launches a tactical intelligence program in Riyadh
The Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition, with Saudi support, launched a tactical intelligence program at its headquarters in Riyadh to enhance cooperation among member states in confronting threats.
The Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition (IMCTC), headquartered in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, announced the launch of its “Tactical Intelligence Program,” a strategic step aimed at enhancing the joint capabilities of member states in confronting escalating terrorist threats. This program is fully supported by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, underscoring its pivotal role in leading and coordinating regional and international efforts to combat extremism.
Background and objectives of the alliance
The Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition (IMCTC) was established in December 2015 at the initiative of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and currently comprises 41 member states. Its establishment came in response to the urgent need to create a unified and coordinated Islamic front against terrorism, which distorts the image of Islam and threatens the security and stability of nations. The coalition operates within four main areas: intellectual, media, counter-terrorism financing, and military, with the aim of providing a comprehensive and integrated response to eradicate this phenomenon at its roots.
The importance of the tactical intelligence program
The launch of the Tactical Intelligence Program is a cornerstone of the Alliance's military capabilities, focusing on building an integrated system for the immediate exchange of accurate and actionable intelligence among member states. The importance of tactical intelligence lies in its ability to provide the data necessary for planning and executing proactive and precise operations, thwarting terrorist plots before they occur, and dismantling extremist networks. The program will contribute to standardizing concepts, exchanging expertise and best practices, and utilizing the latest analytical technologies to close gaps that terrorist organizations might exploit.
Expected impact at the regional and international levels
This initiative is expected to have a profound impact at both the regional and international levels. Regionally, the program strengthens the security architecture in the Middle East and the wider Muslim world by elevating intelligence cooperation to unprecedented levels, which is vital for countering transnational threats. Internationally, the program positions the Alliance as an active and influential partner in global counterterrorism efforts and underscores the Muslim world’s commitment to achieving peace and security. Furthermore, the Kingdom’s support for and hosting of this program reflects its unwavering commitment to leading the fight against extremism, which aligns with the goals of Vision 2030, which prioritizes stability and security.
Politics
The death of Rifaat al-Assad: The end of the 'Butcher of Hama' and his bloody career
Rifaat al-Assad, Bashar al-Assad's uncle, has died at the age of 88. He was known as the "Butcher of Hama" for his role in the 1982 massacre. Learn about his bloody history, his legal troubles, and his fate after the fall of the regime.
Rifaat al-Assad, the uncle of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and one of the most prominent and ruthless figures in the decades-long Assad family rule, has died at the age of 88. His death comes shortly after the fall of his nephew's regime in December 2014, bringing to a close the life of a controversial figure whose name is linked to one of the bloodiest chapters in modern Syrian history.
Historical context: The Hama massacre
The name Rifaat al-Assad cannot be mentioned without recalling the events of the 1982 Hama massacre . At the time, Rifaat commanded the Defense Brigades, a semi-autonomous and well-equipped military force whose primary mission was to protect the regime of his brother, Hafez al-Assad. When an armed uprising led by the Muslim Brotherhood erupted in the city of Hama, the Defense Brigades were tasked with suppressing it. The result was a brutal military campaign that lasted for weeks, during which the city was indiscriminately bombarded and its old quarters destroyed, resulting in the deaths of between 10,000 and 40,000 civilians, according to various estimates. This massacre cemented the title "Butcher of Hama," which haunted Rifaat al-Assad until his death.
A power struggle and a long exile
Rifaat's career was not limited to military repression; it was also marked by political ambition. In 1984, after his brother Hafez al-Assad suffered a heart attack, Rifaat attempted a coup to seize power, deploying his forces in the streets of Damascus. However, the attempt failed after their mother intervened, and he was exiled from Syria and nominally appointed vice president, beginning a long period of exile in Europe, moving between France and Spain. During his exile, he amassed a considerable fortune, which raised suspicions that it had been plundered from the Syrian treasury.
Significance and impact: legal proceedings and a symbolic end
Internationally, Rifaat al-Assad faced legal proceedings in several European countries. In France, he was convicted of money laundering and embezzling Syrian public funds, receiving a prison sentence and the confiscation of his luxury real estate holdings. Swiss authorities also opened an investigation against him for alleged war crimes related to his role in the Hama massacre. These prosecutions represented a significant symbol in the effort to achieve justice for the victims and hold those responsible for major crimes accountable.
Rifaat al-Assad unexpectedly returned to Syria in 2021, fleeing a prison sentence in France. His stay was short-lived, however. With the collapse of the Assad regime in December 2024, he left the country again, reportedly traveling to the United Arab Emirates via Lebanon. His death today, while still at large, marks the biological end of a symbol of repression, but it also leaves a bitter taste in the mouths of thousands of Syrians who had hoped to see him face justice in a Syrian court for the crimes he is accused of.
Politics
Trump and European policies: Criticism of clean energy and mass immigration
An analysis of Donald Trump’s statements criticizing Europe’s clean energy and immigration policies, highlighting the background of “America First” and its potential impact.
Former US President Donald Trump renewed his criticism of European policies, asserting that the continent is “not headed in the right direction.” He attributed this primarily to what he described as an excessive focus on clean energy and mass immigration policies, which he believes have harmed its economic and security stability. These remarks are part of his ongoing “America First” political discourse, which he repeatedly presented at prominent international forums such as the World Economic Forum in Davos during his presidency.
Historical background and context of “America First”
These criticisms stem from the core political doctrine Trump adopted during his 2016 presidential campaign and throughout his presidency. His foreign policy was based on the premise that traditional alliances and international agreements no longer adequately served American interests. In this context, he criticized NATO allies for failing to meet their financial commitments and withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement, arguing that environmental regulations harmed American industry and gave other countries a competitive advantage. His view of Europe was heavily influenced by this perspective, as he considered its environmental and social policies overly idealistic and unrealistic.
Criticism of energy and immigration policies
Regarding energy, Trump has consistently criticized Europe's, and particularly Germany's, reliance on Russian gas, coupled with its gradual shift away from nuclear power and coal. He argued that this move toward "clean energy" has made Europe dependent on external and unstable energy sources, presenting the United States as a reliable alternative through exports of liquefied natural gas and oil. On immigration, he strongly condemned the "open-door" policies adopted by some European countries, such as Germany in 2015, deeming them a threat to national security and cultural identity, and linking them to increased crime and terrorism.
Importance and expected impact
Trump’s statements take on particular significance given the possibility of his return to the White House. Domestically, they aim to rally his electoral base, which shares his skepticism toward globalization and liberal policies. Internationally, they are causing concern in European capitals, which fear a return to the trade and political tensions that characterized his first term. A potential Trump victory could prompt Europe to reassess its defense and economic strategies and accelerate its efforts toward greater “strategic independence” in energy and defense, in anticipation of a more isolationist and unpredictable US policy.
Politics
Trump threatens to wipe Iran off the map, and Tehran vows revenge for Khamenei
The war of words between Washington and Tehran has escalated. Trump vows to obliterate Iran in response to threats against his life, while Iran warns against harming Khamenei following the assassination of Soleimani.
The war of words between Washington and Tehran has reignited, with former US President Donald Trump issuing a fierce threat, vowing to "obliterate Iran from the face of the earth" should he be assassinated. This statement has only added fuel to the already simmering tensions and has drawn an equally sharp response from Iran, reflecting the deep-seated animosity between the two countries.
Background to the tension: A legacy of hostility
These mutual threats cannot be understood in isolation from their historical context, particularly during the Trump presidency. In 2018, the United States unilaterally withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal (the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) and reimposed crippling economic sanctions under a policy dubbed “maximum pressure.” This policy led to a sharp decline in the Iranian economy and exacerbated tensions between the two sides.
Tensions reached a peak in January 2020 with the US assassination of Qassem Soleimani, commander of the Quds Force of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, in an airstrike in Baghdad. Since then, Iran has repeatedly vowed revenge for Soleimani’s killing, considering Trump and other US officials legitimate targets, which explains Trump’s sensitivity to any potential threats to his life.
Details of the latest threats
In a recent interview with News Nation, Trump, when asked about Iranian threats, said, “I gave very strong instructions, and if anything happens, they will be wiped off the face of the earth.” This statement is a continuation of Trump’s approach, in which he has previously used extreme rhetoric, emphasizing that the United States will not hesitate to respond to any attack on its leadership.
In response, Iran issued a swift rebuttal through the spokesman for the General Staff of the Armed Forces, General Abolfazl Shekarchi, who asserted that “Trump is well aware of the seriousness of Tehran’s position.” State media quoted him as saying, “If the hand of aggression reaches out to our leader (Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei), we will not only cut off that hand, but we will set their world ablaze and leave them no safe haven in the region.”.
Internal and regional dimensions
These threats coincide with significant internal challenges facing the Iranian regime, as the country has witnessed widespread protests fueled by deteriorating living conditions and social restrictions. In such circumstances, the regime often resorts to escalating its rhetoric abroad to garner domestic support and divert attention from its problems. Authorities have responded to these protests with brutal repression, resulting in hundreds of deaths and thousands of arrests, according to international human rights organizations.
Regionally and internationally, this war of words exacerbates instability in the Middle East and casts a shadow over any future diplomatic efforts, particularly regarding the stalled nuclear negotiations. It also puts US allies in the region on high alert, fearing that any spark could ignite a wider military confrontation with potentially disastrous consequences for all.
-
Reports 6 days ago
Achievements of Saudi government sectors in 2025
-
Local news two weeks ago
FDA warns of contaminated Nestle infant formula | Recall details
-
Technology 4 weeks ago
US ban on drones: reasons and consequences
-
Technology 4 weeks ago
SRMG and Snapchat partnership: The future of digital media in the Middle East
-
Technology 4 weeks ago
Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Islamic Affairs is employing artificial intelligence in public speaking
-
Sports 4 weeks ago
Salah leads Egypt to a thrilling comeback against Zimbabwe in the Africa Cup of Nations
-
Sports 4 weeks ago
Napoli win the Italian Super Cup in Riyadh for the third time (2025)
-
Sports 4 weeks ago
Alexander Isak's injury: A major blow to Newcastle United's ambitions