Politics
34 killed and wounded in Turkish bombing of Iraqi Kurdistan
Iraqi security sources reported that nine Iraqis were killed and 25 others were wounded on Wednesday in a Turkish bombing that targeted a resort in the province
Iraqi security sources reported that nine Iraqis were killed and 25 others were wounded on Wednesday in a Turkish bombing that targeted a resort in Dohuk province in the Kurdistan region in far northern Iraq.
Sources reported that the Barkh resort in the Dohuk governorate bordering Turkey was bombed, targeting Iraqis coming from Iraqi governorates. The bombing resulted in a preliminary toll of 9 dead and 25 injured, including children and women, some of whom are in critical condition.
For his part , Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mohammed al-Halbousi stressed that Iraq must not become "an open arena for settling regional scores and external conflicts." He called on the Iraqi government to "take the necessary measures to investigate and adopt all means to preserve the country and protect its people."
Politics
New Mexico investigation into Epstein's ranch: details of the historic decision
New Mexico opens a formal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro Ranch. Learn about the legislative committee's efforts to uncover human trafficking networks.
In a decisive legal and legislative move, lawmakers in the US state of New Mexico passed new legislation aimed at launching a comprehensive and extensive investigation into the events that transpired behind the walls of Zorro Ranch, the sprawling estate associated with the late disgraced sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. This step comes in response to growing demands from human rights groups and the public for transparency regarding the network Epstein operated in secrecy.
Bipartisan fact-finding committee
Under the new legislation, a special bipartisan commission will be formed in the state legislature. This commission will have broad powers to gather evidence, subpoena witnesses, and, most importantly, provide a secure platform for survivors to testify about the egregious abuse they suffered at the ranch. The ranch is located in a remote area about 48 kilometers south of Santa Fe, which for many years kept it largely out of scrutiny.
"Zorro Ranch": The Mysterious Castle
This ranch holds particular significance in the context of federal and local investigations, as it spans thousands of acres and includes a sprawling mansion and a private airstrip. The property has long been suspected of being a major hub for the human trafficking operations with which Epstein was accused. This move is the first of its kind at the state level to directly target activities that took place on the property, aiming to determine whether local individuals or others facilitated or covered up these crimes.
A complex historical and legal context
This investigation comes at a time when the Jeffrey Epstein case continues to generate widespread international controversy, particularly following his death in his Manhattan jail cell in 2019, officially ruled a suicide. This effectively prevented a trial that would have revealed many secrets. However, the recent release of court documents related to Virginia Giuffre's lawsuit against Epstein's associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, has brought the case back into sharp focus, revealing a vast network of connections involving politicians, financiers, and celebrities.
The importance of the investigation and its expected impact
Observers believe the New Mexico investigation holds immense symbolic and legal significance. It not only seeks to hold accountable potential perpetrators who may have escaped federal scrutiny, but also aims to close the legal loopholes that allowed these abuses to continue for years. Furthermore, the investigation sends a powerful message of support to the victims, affirming that justice does not expire and that the death of the main suspect does not mean the case is closed as long as there are survivors demanding their rights.
Politics
Saudi Arabia and seven other countries condemn the escalation of settlement activity in the West Bank
Saudi Arabia and seven other countries issued a joint statement condemning Israel's classification of lands in the West Bank as "state lands," warning of the undermining of the two-state solution and calling for urgent international intervention.
In a unified diplomatic move reflecting the seriousness of the situation in the occupied Palestinian territories, the foreign ministers of eight countries – the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, the State of Qatar, the Arab Republic of Egypt, the Republic of Turkey, the Republic of Indonesia, and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan – issued a joint statement expressing their strong condemnation of the recent Israeli decisions concerning the Palestinian territories.
Unprecedented escalation of settlement activity since 1967
The ministers condemned in the strongest terms Israel’s move to designate large areas of land in the occupied West Bank as “state land.” The statement noted that these actions include approving the commencement of land registration and settlement procedures, a dangerous step being taken for the first time since the occupation of the West Bank in 1967. The ministers considered this move a flagrant violation of international law and an escalation aimed at legitimizing and expanding settlements at the expense of the rights of the Palestinian people.
Violation of international laws and resolutions
The joint statement affirmed that these measures fundamentally violate international humanitarian law, specifically the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits an occupying power from transferring its own population into the territory it occupies or altering its geographic and demographic character. The ministers also stressed that these practices constitute a blatant challenge to relevant UN Security Council resolutions, foremost among them Resolution 2334, which affirms the illegality of settlements in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem.
In a related context, the ministers pointed out that the Israeli decision contradicts the advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice, which clarified the legal implications of Israeli policies, stressing the illegality of any measures aimed at changing the historical and legal status of the occupied territory, and the need to end the occupation and prohibit the seizure of land by military force.
Risks of undermining the two-state solution
The foreign ministers of the eight countries warned of the political and security repercussions of these steps, emphasizing that they aim to impose a new administrative and legal reality that entrenches permanent Israeli control. They explained that the continued confiscation of land and the accelerated pace of settlement construction effectively undermine the two-state solution and eliminate any political prospect for the establishment of an independent, viable, and geographically contiguous Palestinian state. They cautioned that these policies pose a real threat to the chances of achieving a just and comprehensive peace in the region and exacerbate tension and instability in the Middle East.
A call for the international community to assume its responsibilities
The ministers concluded their statement with a clear call for the international community to take immediate action and fulfill its legal and moral responsibilities. They demanded decisive and clear steps to halt these ongoing violations and ensure Israel's respect for international law. They reaffirmed their full support for the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, foremost among them their right to self-determination, an end to the occupation, and the establishment of their independent state on the June 4, 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, as the only way to achieve lasting stability in the region.
Politics
Trump participates in Iran nuclear talks amid military buildup
Trump announces his indirect participation in the Geneva nuclear talks with Iran, amid US military reinforcements and Iranian drills, and fears of the negotiations failing and resorting to the military option.
In a significant development regarding the complex nuclear issue, US President Donald Trump announced his intention to participate indirectly in the new round of nuclear talks between the United States and Iran, scheduled to begin today, Tuesday, in Geneva, Switzerland. Trump expressed cautious optimism, stating his belief that the leadership in Tehran is genuinely willing to reach an agreement that would end the current impasse.
Historical context and escalating tensions
These talks come at a critical juncture in US-Iranian relations, with the Iranian nuclear program representing one of the most complex issues in international politics for decades. Washington and other Western powers have long sought to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program, while Tehran insists on its right to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. The Geneva round of negotiations is of paramount importance given the historical accumulation of economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure that has shaped the current landscape, making any diplomatic breakthrough a globally significant event.
The military option is on the table
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump described the upcoming talks as “very important.” These political pronouncements coincide with tangible military moves on the ground, as the United States has deployed a second aircraft carrier to the Middle East in a clear message of deterrence. Reports from US officials confirm that the American military is making extensive preparations for a potential protracted military campaign should the diplomatic track fail to achieve its objectives.
Negotiation obstacles and previous strikes
Regarding the chances of success for the negotiations, the US president pointed out that Iran had previously engaged in what he described as difficult negotiations, noting that Tehran had realized the consequences of its hardline stance. He cited the US strikes targeting Iranian nuclear sites last summer, which he said marked a turning point in dealing with the crisis. The talks face a major obstacle: Washington's insistence on halting uranium enrichment within Iranian territory. The US administration considers this a fundamental guarantee against Tehran developing a nuclear weapon, while Iran views it as an infringement on its sovereignty.
Iranian preparations and regional repercussions
In a related development, and in parallel with diplomatic efforts, Iran continues to bolster its domestic preparedness. The Iranian Civil Defense Organization conducted large-scale drills simulating a response to a chemical attack in the Pars Special Economic Zone, an energy hub. These drills are part of broader efforts to enhance readiness to counter any potential threats in the south of the country, an area that houses vital energy facilities.
Observers believe that the results of these talks will not only affect bilateral relations between Washington and Tehran, but will also extend to the stability of the entire Middle East region and global energy markets, given the strategic location of the Arabian Gulf and its importance in global oil supplies.
-
Culture and Art 6 days ago
The "Between and Between" exhibition in Jeddah: 5 artists reshape Saudi memory
-
Local News 4 days ago
Saudi Arabia's National Arabic Language Policy: 8 Principles to Promote Identity
-
Culture and Art 7 days ago
Shakira's concert in Jeddah: Details of the international star's first concert in Saudi Arabia
-
Local News 3 days ago
Adopting the National Policy for the Arabic Language: Strengthening Identity and Vision 2030
-
Culture and Art, 1 week ago
The truth about Nancy Ajram's video and Epstein Island, and her legal response
-
Local News 4 days ago
The Riyadh-Rin-Bisha dual carriageway, spanning 559 km, has been completed
-
Local news one week ago
Launch of the new Dammam project with investments of 98 billion riyals
-
Politics, one week ago
Washington Post president resigns after laying off a third of staff