Connect with us

Politics

3 years to verify the value of the real estate transaction

The new real estate transaction tax system allows the Zakat, Tax and Customs Authority a period not exceeding 3 years from the date of the transaction

Published

on

The new real estate transaction tax system allows the Zakat, Tax and Customs Authority a period not exceeding 3 years from the date of the real estate transaction to verify the value of the transaction disclosed, and to recalculate the tax due if it is proven that that value is less than the limits of the fair market value, including cases of evasion.

The Real Estate Transactions Tax Law, approved by the Council of Ministers, grants those who conducted any undocumented real estate transaction before the effective date of the tax on 14/2/1442 AH (corresponding to 2020 CE), a one-year grace period from the date of the law's implementation to rectify their status and document their transactions in accordance with the relevant regulations. This grace period may be extended by a decision of the Council of Ministers based on a proposal from the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Zakat, Tax and Customs Authority.

Article Two stipulates that a tax of (5%) shall be imposed on real estate transactions, regardless of the condition, form, or use of the property being disposed of at the time of the transaction, whether the transaction includes the entire property or a part of it, whether it is divided or shared, whether the property being disposed of is completed, under construction, on the map, or otherwise, and whether it has been documented or not.

According to the regulations, the tax is calculated based on the total value of the real estate transaction agreed upon between the seller and the buyer, provided that – at the time of the transaction – it falls within the fair market value. For the purposes of calculating the tax, the value of the real estate transaction does not include the cost of financing from legally authorized entities.

Real estate transactions are subject to tax only once, provided that the parties to the transaction, the property, and the value are unified. The regulations shall specify the provisions and controls necessary for the application of this article, including those related to the real estate company.

Article Three confirmed that real estate transactions in cases of estate division, real estate transactions – without consideration – to a public, private or joint endowment, as well as real estate transactions – without consideration – to or from a legally licensed charitable association, are completely exempt from tax.

The exemption does not apply when real estate is disposed of by a public entity or any public legal entity, or entities or projects of public benefit, and when real estate is disposed of by a public entity in its capacity as a public authority, or real estate is disposed of in cases of expropriation for the public interest or temporary seizure of the property.

One of the cases of total exemption is when the real estate transaction is made by the husband, wife, or any of the relatives up to the third degree, by way of a documented gift, or real estate transaction in execution of a documented legal will, and when real estate transaction is made in cases of public subscription, trading of listed securities, and trading of investment fund units.

The temporary real estate transaction between an investment fund and a custodian – or vice versa – or between custodians of the same fund, is fully exempt from tax, in accordance with the provisions of the Capital Market Law and the regulations and instructions issued thereunder, and when the real estate transaction provides an in-kind share in the capital of a company established in the Kingdom, provided that the shares or stakes corresponding to the in-kind share are not disposed of for the period specified by the regulation, not exceeding (5) years, and that the company maintains audited financial statements from an accredited external auditor throughout that period.

It is completely exempt when dealing with real estate in cases where one of the parties to the transaction is a foreign government or international organization, or a diplomatic or military body or mission, or a member of the diplomatic, consular or military corps accredited to the Kingdom, provided that there is reciprocity.

It is exempt in the case of a real estate transaction that provides an in-kind subscription to the capital of a real estate investment fund, in accordance with the provisions of the Capital Market Law and the regulations and instructions issued thereunder, and when a temporary real estate transaction is made for the purpose of using the property as collateral for financing or credit, unless it is executed on the property by permanently transferring its ownership to the financier or a third party.

One of the cases of total exemption is the real estate transaction carried out in execution of a forced sale order issued by a competent court, or the real estate transaction resulting from mergers and acquisitions between legal entities.

The exemption cases included real estate transactions by a natural person for a company or investment fund established in the Kingdom, and this person owns - directly or indirectly - all the company’s shares, stocks or fund units, provided that there is no change in the percentage of his ownership in the company or fund for the period specified by the regulation, not exceeding (5) years.

The exemptions included real estate transactions between two companies established in the Kingdom, where one owns – directly or indirectly – all the shares or stakes of the other company; real estate transactions between a company and an investment fund established in the Kingdom, where the company owns – directly or indirectly – all the units of the fund; and real estate transactions between companies or investment funds established in the Kingdom, where all their shares, stakes, or units are owned – directly or indirectly – by the same person. In all cases, it is stipulated that all shares of the company to which the transaction is made, or stakes or units of the fund to which the transaction is made, remain owned – directly or indirectly – by the same person for a period not exceeding five (5) years, as specified in the regulations. Exemptions also applied to real estate transactions by any person to a real estate developer licensed to conduct off-plan sales and leasing activities in accordance with the applicable regulations, rules, controls, and instructions in the Kingdom, provided that the property is designated for an off-plan sales project and has received a license from the competent authority. The system stipulates that real estate transactions without consideration for a company or investment fund established in the Kingdom are completely exempt from tax, provided that all shares, stocks, or fund units are owned – directly or indirectly – by a public, private, or joint endowment, and on the condition that there is no change in the percentage of endowment ownership in the company or fund for the period specified by the regulations, not exceeding (5) years.

The property that was disposed of is exempted when it is returned to its previous owner as a result of the cancellation of the documented real estate transaction - before the notary public or the accredited notary - by mutual agreement between its parties, within a period not exceeding (90) days from the date of documentation of the real estate transaction subject to cancellation, and on the condition that no change has occurred to the description of the property, and its full value is returned.

The person in charge shall be responsible for the tax due and shall pay it to the Authority, in accordance with the procedures and within the dates specified by the regulation, without prejudice to the provisions of Article (Five) of the system.

The recipient shall be jointly liable with the transferor for the payment of the tax due, in cases where it is proven to the Authority that he was the cause of the non-payment of the tax due.

For the purposes of applying the provisions of this article, the term “transferrer” means the person for whose benefit the real estate transaction is made.

Article Eight of the system clarified that the Authority – within a period not exceeding (three) years from the date of the real estate transaction – must verify the value of the disclosed real estate transaction, and it must recalculate the tax due in cases where it is proven to it that that value is less than the limits of the fair market value, including cases of tax evasion, in accordance with what the regulation indicates.

The Authority shall, within a period not exceeding (three) years from the date of the real estate transaction for the purposes of calculating the tax due, estimate the value of the real estate transaction of undetermined value, which has been disclosed to the Authority.

The Authority shall calculate the tax due on the undocumented or undisclosed real estate transaction, and the Authority shall demand payment of the tax due within a period not exceeding (three) years from the date of the real estate transaction, or from the date it became aware of the undocumented or undisclosed real estate transaction.

What is tax evasion?

The regulations define tax evasion as the submission of forged, fabricated, or incorrect documents, information, statements, or records, or similar items, related to real estate transactions, with the intent to evade paying the due tax. The burden of proof rests with the taxpayer to demonstrate the absence of such intent.

It is considered tax evasion to commit any other act with the intent of evading payment of the tax due.

Penalties are imposed on those who violate the regulations, including a fine not exceeding three times the amount of tax evaded. The same penalty applies to anyone proven to have participated in, aided, or facilitated tax evasion.

A penalty of (2%) of the value of the unpaid tax is set for each month or part thereof for which the tax has not been paid, and not exceeding (50%) of the value of the unpaid tax. The penalty shall be calculated from the day following the end of the period specified for the payment of the tax due. An additional penalty of (1%) of the value of the unpaid tax shall be imposed for each month or part thereof if the value of the tax due is amended by the Authority. The penalty shall be calculated after (30) days have passed from the date of notification of the amendment.

The Saudi News Network first launched on Twitter via its official account, @SaudiNews50, and quickly became one of the Kingdom's leading independent news sources, thanks to its fast and reliable coverage of major local and international events. Due to the growing trust of its followers, the network expanded by launching its website, a comprehensive news platform offering regularly updated content in the fields of politics, economics, health, education, and national events, presented in a professional style that meets the public's expectations. The network strives to enhance public awareness and provide accurate information in a timely manner through on-the-ground reporting, in-depth analysis, and a specialized editorial team, making it a trusted source for anyone seeking up-to-the-minute Saudi news.

Politics

The Crown Prince receives a message from the President of Kazakhstan to enhance bilateral cooperation

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman received a written message from the President of Kazakhstan concerning bilateral relations, which was received by Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan in Riyadh.

Published

on

The Crown Prince receives a message from the President of Kazakhstan to enhance bilateral cooperation

His Royal Highness Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, Crown Prince and Prime Minister, received an important written message from His Excellency President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The message focused on ways to strengthen and develop the close bilateral relations between the two brotherly countries and to propel them towards broader horizons in various fields.

His Highness Prince Faisal bin Farhan bin Abdullah, Minister of Foreign Affairs, received the message during his official meeting today at the Ministry's headquarters in Riyadh with His Excellency Yermek Kosherbayev, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan. During the meeting, they reviewed aspects of joint cooperation and ways to enhance them in a manner that serves the interests of both countries and their friendly peoples.

The depth of Saudi-Kazakh relations

This message comes amidst the active diplomatic efforts underway in relations between the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Republic of Kazakhstan, two countries bound by deep-rooted historical ties based on shared values ​​and mutual respect. These relations are gaining increasing importance in light of global geopolitical and economic shifts, as Kazakhstan is the largest country in Central Asia and a key strategic partner for the Kingdom in this vital region.

Prospects for economic and investment cooperation

Economically, the two countries possess tremendous potential for cooperation, particularly in the energy sector. Both Saudi Arabia and Kazakhstan are major global oil producers and active members of the OPEC+ alliance, which strengthens their joint coordination to ensure the stability of global energy markets. Furthermore, Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 opens up vast opportunities for mutual investments in mining, infrastructure, food security, and renewable energy, aligning with Kazakhstan's development goals.

The importance of political coordination

On the political front, the exchange of messages between the two leaderships reflects a mutual commitment to continued consultation and coordination on regional and international issues of common interest. The Kingdom plays a pivotal role in promoting stability in the Middle East, while Kazakhstan serves as a vital bridge between Asia and Europe, making the strengthening of their partnership a cornerstone of security and stability in both regions.

The reception was attended on the Saudi side by the Undersecretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for Political Affairs, Dr. Saud Al-Sati, and the Ambassador of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques to the Republic of Kazakhstan, Faisal Al-Qahtani, reflecting the high-level diplomatic interest in the outcomes of this meeting and the future steps that will result from it to strengthen the strategic partnership.

Continue Reading

Politics

New Mexico investigation into Epstein's ranch: details of the historic decision

New Mexico opens a formal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro Ranch. Learn about the legislative committee's efforts to uncover human trafficking networks.

Published

on

New Mexico investigation into Epstein's ranch: details of the historic decision

In a decisive legal and legislative move, lawmakers in the US state of New Mexico passed new legislation aimed at launching a comprehensive and extensive investigation into the events that transpired behind the walls of Zorro Ranch, the sprawling estate associated with the late disgraced sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. This step comes in response to growing demands from human rights groups and the public for transparency regarding the network Epstein operated in secrecy.

Bipartisan fact-finding committee

Under the new legislation, a special bipartisan commission will be formed in the state legislature. This commission will have broad powers to gather evidence, subpoena witnesses, and, most importantly, provide a secure platform for survivors to testify about the egregious abuse they suffered at the ranch. The ranch is located in a remote area about 48 kilometers south of Santa Fe, which for many years kept it largely out of scrutiny.

"Zorro Ranch": The Mysterious Castle

This ranch holds particular significance in the context of federal and local investigations, as it spans thousands of acres and includes a sprawling mansion and a private airstrip. The property has long been suspected of being a major hub for the human trafficking operations with which Epstein was accused. This move is the first of its kind at the state level to directly target activities that took place on the property, aiming to determine whether local individuals or others facilitated or covered up these crimes.

A complex historical and legal context

This investigation comes at a time when the Jeffrey Epstein case continues to generate widespread international controversy, particularly following his death in his Manhattan jail cell in 2019, officially ruled a suicide. This effectively prevented a trial that would have revealed many secrets. However, the recent release of court documents related to Virginia Giuffre's lawsuit against Epstein's associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, has brought the case back into sharp focus, revealing a vast network of connections involving politicians, financiers, and celebrities.

The importance of the investigation and its expected impact

Observers believe the New Mexico investigation holds immense symbolic and legal significance. It not only seeks to hold accountable potential perpetrators who may have escaped federal scrutiny, but also aims to close the legal loopholes that allowed these abuses to continue for years. Furthermore, the investigation sends a powerful message of support to the victims, affirming that justice does not expire and that the death of the main suspect does not mean the case is closed as long as there are survivors demanding their rights.

Continue Reading

Politics

Saudi Arabia and seven other countries condemn the escalation of settlement activity in the West Bank

Saudi Arabia and seven other countries issued a joint statement condemning Israel's classification of lands in the West Bank as "state lands," warning of the undermining of the two-state solution and calling for urgent international intervention.

Published

on

Saudi Arabia and seven other countries condemn the escalation of settlement activity in the West Bank

In a unified diplomatic move reflecting the seriousness of the situation in the occupied Palestinian territories, the foreign ministers of eight countries – the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, the State of Qatar, the Arab Republic of Egypt, the Republic of Turkey, the Republic of Indonesia, and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan – issued a joint statement expressing their strong condemnation of the recent Israeli decisions concerning the Palestinian territories.

Unprecedented escalation of settlement activity since 1967

The ministers condemned in the strongest terms Israel’s move to designate large areas of land in the occupied West Bank as “state land.” The statement noted that these actions include approving the commencement of land registration and settlement procedures, a dangerous step being taken for the first time since the occupation of the West Bank in 1967. The ministers considered this move a flagrant violation of international law and an escalation aimed at legitimizing and expanding settlements at the expense of the rights of the Palestinian people.

Violation of international laws and resolutions

The joint statement affirmed that these measures fundamentally violate international humanitarian law, specifically the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits an occupying power from transferring its own population into the territory it occupies or altering its geographic and demographic character. The ministers also stressed that these practices constitute a blatant challenge to relevant UN Security Council resolutions, foremost among them Resolution 2334, which affirms the illegality of settlements in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem.

In a related context, the ministers pointed out that the Israeli decision contradicts the advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice, which clarified the legal implications of Israeli policies, stressing the illegality of any measures aimed at changing the historical and legal status of the occupied territory, and the need to end the occupation and prohibit the seizure of land by military force.

Risks of undermining the two-state solution

The foreign ministers of the eight countries warned of the political and security repercussions of these steps, emphasizing that they aim to impose a new administrative and legal reality that entrenches permanent Israeli control. They explained that the continued confiscation of land and the accelerated pace of settlement construction effectively undermine the two-state solution and eliminate any political prospect for the establishment of an independent, viable, and geographically contiguous Palestinian state. They cautioned that these policies pose a real threat to the chances of achieving a just and comprehensive peace in the region and exacerbate tension and instability in the Middle East.

A call for the international community to assume its responsibilities

The ministers concluded their statement with a clear call for the international community to take immediate action and fulfill its legal and moral responsibilities. They demanded decisive and clear steps to halt these ongoing violations and ensure Israel's respect for international law. They reaffirmed their full support for the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, foremost among them their right to self-determination, an end to the occupation, and the establishment of their independent state on the June 4, 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, as the only way to achieve lasting stability in the region.

Continue Reading

Trending News