Connect with us

Politics

Are the Muslim Brotherhood in Jordan following in Hamas's footsteps?

Is the Muslim Brotherhood in Jordan now following in Hamas's footsteps? And has this group revealed its true colors through this operation?

Published

on

Is the Muslim Brotherhood in Jordan now following in Hamas's footsteps? Has this group revealed its true colors through the operation carried out today (Friday) against the Israeli army by breaching the border? Why did the group adopt Hamas's methods in carrying out operations, with the two perpetrators appearing to recite their wills in a video? Has the Jordanian Brotherhood effectively entered the realm of armed action? What are the repercussions of this issue on the relationship between the Brotherhood and the Jordanian state? These questions, and many more, are being raised by the Jordanian public at the moment.

Abu Ubaida al-Shafi’i and Abu Izz al-Din represent a completely new and very important situation that emerged at the critical moments that the region is going through, which are open to all possibilities, in contrast to the already tense and crisis-ridden situation on the shoulders of the Jordan Valley region, where the Jordanian border is with Israel.

The first title holder is Jordanian teacher Amer Qawas, born in 1999, married with a family. The second title holder is a young engineer and university graduate working in the private sector named Wissam Hussein Abu Ghazaleh. Both decided to carry out an operation in the Jordan Valley “in support of Gaza,” less than 24 hours after the announcement of Yahya Sinwar’s death. Perhaps it is the first time since 1994 that the Jordan Valley has witnessed an operation of this kind recorded through a “legal will” in the style of Palestinian suicide bombers.

The Jordanian Armed Forces General Command confirmed that reports circulating in Hebrew media regarding Jordanian soldiers crossing the border were false. It denied Israeli media claims about the affiliations of the two young men, who carried out the operation while wearing Jordanian military uniforms.

The engineer and the teacher, as reported on social media platforms, were friends and had a special relationship that apparently ended with a decision to carry out a shooting operation and confront the Israeli army near a settlement attached to the Dead Sea, resulting in their deaths and the injury of two Israeli soldiers.

The result was reported by news agencies, as two Israeli soldiers were wounded and the perpetrators were killed before a video of each of them spread like wildfire, containing the legal will, the reasons for leaving, and the intentions of the execution, which the two suicide bombers clearly said followed the repercussions of the events of October 7.

So far, neither the Israeli authorities nor Amman have announced details of the operation. An Israeli theory has been circulating that two perpetrators crossed the border into Jordan and clashed with military forces, a claim that has not yet been confirmed by any official Jordanian account. The Jordanian side has only said that it is gathering details and investigating them.

The registration of the final will is also a new development, occurring for the first time in the history of attempts to infiltrate Israel through the Jordan Valley.

The two perpetrators in the most important development are successful, religious university students with advanced professional backgrounds and, most importantly, the use of "religious legal titles." The most prominent element in the Dead Sea operation is represented by the official spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood, Muath Khawaldeh, who was quoted by news agencies as saying explicitly that both Amer Qawas and Hussam Abu Ghazaleh are registered organizationally in the Brotherhood.

The Muslim Brotherhood, through its leader, Engineer Murad Adhaileh, had stated dozens of times that the “Al-Aqsa flood” was also Jordanian, and threatened Israel, its army and its government if they thought of attacking Jordan.

The “Shafi’i and Izz al-Din” operation near the Dead Sea raises dozens of political questions and will likely be followed by repercussions of various kinds, because some party is addressing and practically warning all parties with messages that go beyond what happened with Maher al-Jazi, who carried out the bridge operation in which three Israelis were killed.

The Saudi News Network first launched on Twitter via its official account, @SaudiNews50, and quickly became one of the Kingdom's leading independent news sources, thanks to its fast and reliable coverage of major local and international events. Due to the growing trust of its followers, the network expanded by launching its website, a comprehensive news platform offering regularly updated content in the fields of politics, economics, health, education, and national events, presented in a professional style that meets the public's expectations. The network strives to enhance public awareness and provide accurate information in a timely manner through on-the-ground reporting, in-depth analysis, and a specialized editorial team, making it a trusted source for anyone seeking up-to-the-minute Saudi news.

Politics

Four sailors injured in Iranian attack on oil tanker in Strait of Hormuz

The Sultanate of Oman announces that four sailors were injured following an Iranian attack on the oil tanker Skylight in the Strait of Hormuz. Details of the attack and its impact on maritime security in the Gulf.

Published

on

Four sailors injured in Iranian attack on oil tanker in Strait of Hormuz

The Sultanate of Oman has officially announced that an oil tanker was attacked in the strategic Strait of Hormuz, resulting in injuries to four sailors on board, in an incident that once again highlights security tensions in one of the world's most important waterways.

The official Oman News Agency, quoting the Maritime Security Centre, reported that the attack targeted a commercial vessel flying the flag of Palau, named "Skylight." The incident occurred specifically five nautical miles north of the port of Khasab in the Musandam Governorate, an area directly overlooking shipping traffic in the strait.

Details of the evacuation and injuries

The Maritime Security Centre in the Sultanate of Oman explained that, in response to the distress call, an immediate evacuation operation was carried out for the 20-member crew of the tanker SKYLIGHT. Official data indicated that the crew included 15 Indian nationals and 5 Iranian nationals.

The center noted that initial information and medical assessments confirmed that four crew members sustained injuries of varying severity and were quickly transferred to Omani medical facilities for treatment. This comes as media reports, including those from Iranian television, indicated that Iranian forces targeted the tanker, adding a complex political and security dimension to the incident.

The strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz

This incident is of paramount importance given its location in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital artery for global oil supplies. Nearly a fifth of the world's oil consumption passes through this narrow waterway, and major Asian and European nations rely on it to secure their energy needs. Any security threat in this region not only affects the littoral states but also has repercussions for the stability of global energy markets and oil prices.

Context of maritime tensions in the region

This incident is not isolated from the context of ongoing tensions in the Gulf and the Sea of ​​Oman. The past few years have witnessed a series of similar incidents targeting commercial vessels and oil tankers, prompting several major powers to bolster their naval presence to ensure freedom of navigation. The international community views such attacks with grave concern, considering them a direct threat to international maritime law and security.

The Sultanate of Oman usually plays a pivotal role in maintaining balance and stability in this sensitive region, thanks to its geographical location and balanced foreign policy, as the Omani Maritime Security Centre always seeks to ensure the safety of navigation and to deal quickly with any maritime emergencies that may occur in territorial waters or exclusive economic zones.

Continue Reading

Politics

Egypt denies Israeli claims of informing it of the date of the strike on Iran

An Egyptian source denies Haaretz reports that Tel Aviv notified Cairo of the date of the attack on Iran, stressing Egypt's rejection of military escalation and its commitment to the diplomatic path to resolve crises.

Published

on

Egypt denies Israeli claims of informing it of the date of the strike on Iran

A senior Egyptian official categorically denied on Sunday Israeli media reports claiming that Tel Aviv had informed Cairo of its plans to launch a military attack on Iran approximately 48 hours beforehand. The official asserted that these claims were "completely baseless" and had no connection to reality, emphasizing that Egypt's position was clear and publicly stated.

This official denial came in response to a report published by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz yesterday (Saturday), in which it claimed, quoting unnamed diplomatic sources, that Israel had informed Egypt in advance of the strike plan and its timing, claiming that Cairo did not express an intention to participate but was aware of it, which Cairo categorically denied.

The context of regional tensions and Egypt's firm stance

This denial comes at a highly sensitive time, as the Middle East region witnesses unprecedented geopolitical tensions. Egypt has consistently affirmed, through its diplomatic channels and official statements, its unwavering commitment to resolving regional crises through diplomacy and dialogue, rejecting the principle of military escalation that could drag the region into a full-blown war. Since the outbreak of the current tensions, Cairo has played a pivotal role as a buffer, attempting to mediate and de-escalate the situation, both in the Gaza Strip and in other regional issues related to the Israeli-Iranian conflict.

Dimensions of Egyptian exile and its political impact

The Egyptian denial carries significant political implications on both the regional and international levels. It preempts any attempts to implicate Egypt or suggest the existence of covert security coordination in offensive operations that contradict Egypt's political doctrine of defending Arab national security and refraining from military intervention in the affairs of other countries. This decisive stance also aims to refute the Israeli narrative, which sometimes attempts to portray the existence of implicit regional alliances against Tehran—a notion that clashes with Egypt's foreign policy, which seeks to maintain balanced relations and consistently calls for restraint.

Risks of escalation and its repercussions

Egypt has repeatedly warned of the dangers of sliding into open military confrontations between regional powers, noting that the repercussions of such attacks would not be limited to the warring parties but would extend to affect maritime security, energy prices, and food security in the region and the world. Experts assert that including Egypt's name in such Israeli reports may be an attempt to embarrass Cairo or muddy the political waters. However, Egypt's swift and decisive response reaffirmed its independent decision-making and its rejection of any infringement upon its sovereignty or its declared positions.

Continue Reading

Politics

Aoun: The decision of war and peace rests exclusively with the Lebanese state

President Joseph Aoun affirms from Baabda that the decision of war and peace belongs to the state alone, and discusses the repercussions of Khamenei's assassination and its impact on regional stability during a meeting of the Supreme Defense Council.

Published

on

Aoun: The decision of war and peace rests exclusively with the Lebanese state

Amid the delicate circumstances the region is experiencing, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun reaffirmed a firm and strategic stance regarding national sovereignty, emphasizing that the decision of war and peace rests solely with the Lebanese state . The President clarified that this sovereign right is exercised exclusively by the state through its legitimate constitutional institutions, noting that this principle is agreed upon by all Lebanese parties and has been clearly articulated by the state in both the presidential oath and the current government's ministerial statement, reflecting a national consensus on the necessity of confining critical decisions to official institutions.

Meeting of the Supreme Defense Council and the challenges of the current phase

President Aoun chaired an emergency meeting of the Supreme Defense Council at Baabda Palace today (Sunday) to discuss the rapidly evolving and dangerous regional developments, specifically the repercussions of the assassination of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. This meeting comes at a highly sensitive time, aiming to safeguard the Lebanese domestic scene from any negative fallout that might result from this major event and its potential shifts in the balance of power or direct impacts on regional stability in the Middle East.

The importance of timing and regional context

This official stance gains added significance given the volatile situation in the region. Emphasizing the exclusive right to decide on war and peace is a cornerstone of the policy of "disassociation" and of preventing Lebanon from being drawn into regional conflicts. Recent developments, most notably the absence of a pivotal figure in the regional landscape like the Iranian Supreme Leader, necessitate that the Lebanese state raise its security and political preparedness levels to ensure that Lebanese territory is not used as a conduit for regional tensions.

Arab solidarity and national responsibility

President Aoun opened the meeting by offering his condolences to all the countries affected by the tragic events, expressing his full fraternal solidarity with the brotherly Arab nations. He also stressed his complete and unequivocal condemnation of any targeting of innocent civilians or civilian infrastructure in the region, affirming that Lebanon is an integral part of Arab national security and that its stability is inextricably linked to the stability of its surroundings.

For his part, the Prime Minister and the relevant ministers stressed during the meeting the need for everyone to rally around the state and its military and security institutions at this critical stage, to ensure that Lebanon reaches safety amidst these regional storms.

Continue Reading

Trending News