Connect with us

Politics

The Gaza agreement: the beginning of a major deal

Finally, the US administration, during a transitional phase of handing over power in the United States, succeeded in reaching a ceasefire

Published

on

Finally, the US administration succeeded in a transitional phase of handing over power in the United States in reaching a ceasefire, and began implementing this agreement gradually, until all the terms of the agreement were completed after nearly a year and three months of the shameful bloodbath perpetrated by the Israeli occupation authorities.

The terms of the agreement reached refer to the gradual process of implementing this agreement, which begins with good faith in a six-week ceasefire, followed by the gradual withdrawal of Israeli forces from central Gaza, then the return of displaced Palestinians to the northern part of the Strip, and allowing 600 trucks loaded with humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. The agreement finally ends with the mutual release of prisoners between Israel and Hamas.

The agreement, set to begin implementation next Sunday, will mark the beginning of a return to normalcy in the Gaza Strip and the closing of the darkest chapter in Gaza's history. It will usher in a new era for the people of Gaza first and foremost, and for Palestinians in general. However, the question that arises after this promising agreement is: what remains of the Palestinian cause, and what about the end of this bloody conflict that erupts intermittently? Will the international community, after the events of October 7th, accept that the Palestinian issue remains hostage to the unpredictable actions of the parties to the conflict? And what can the administration of US President Donald Trump accomplish in the next four years?

The most positive aspect of this agreement is the removal of the nightmare from the people of the Gaza Strip, the cessation of daily killing of civilians, the return of displaced persons, and the entry of aid into the Strip. This means that life has been given a new lease on life to the Strip. However, at the same time, we must ask what comes after the agreement and how the Middle East will live after all this bloodshed in Gaza and Lebanon!

The first lesson of the war on Gaza, throughout these past months, is that no one can emerge victorious from any war, and no one can impose their rules on the other without reaching final solutions. If we ask the following question: Couldn't this agreement have been achieved from the first months? The answer is yes. So why all this war, killing, and political obstinacy?!

Arab political literature states that the Palestinian issue is the central issue in the Arab mindset. This literature has been on the Arab table since the Nakba in 1948, and the truth is that the Palestinian issue has not left the table throughout the past decades, as all the sub-issues in the region are a result of postponing the solution to the Palestinian issue.

Right-wing extremism

Israel’s problem in the region is both internal and external. On the internal level, the political elites in Israel cannot live without investing in the Palestinian issue, as Netanyahu did, who wanted to prolong his political life at the expense of the war in Gaza. Keeping the Palestinian issue stalled and without a solution gives Israeli politicians an opportunity to reach power by bidding on the solution, and thus everyone is trying to make the Palestinian issue an Israeli stock exchange.

On the international stage, Israel shapes its regional and global policies around this issue, attempting to exert political pressure on the international community through wars against the Palestinian people. This is particularly significant given Israel's military superiority; consequently, every war waged in the Palestinian territories yields political, military, economic, and other gains for Israeli politicians. The idea of ​​entering into a peace agreement with the Palestinians has never crossed the mind of any Israeli politician, as the Palestinian issue remains a politically lucrative source of income for the Israeli political elite.

In November 1995, Yitzhak Rabin paid the price for accepting peace on the Palestinian and Syrian levels. The extreme right in Israel did not leave Rabin any chance to proceed with the peace agreement, and he ended up assassinated, along with the peace agreement attempts. This is where the problem in Israel lies.

The crux of the matter is the inability of the international community to convince the extreme right that peace is the best battle Israel can fight in the region. Unfortunately, the West often succumbs to the thinking of the extreme right, and this same extreme right feeds on the other right in Gaza with which it exchanges extremism. But the difference is that the Israeli right has the brutality and audacity to kill everything in Palestine, while the Palestinian right is less capable and weaker militarily. This is why the Palestinians always pay the price for the strength of the Israeli right.

From here, although reaching a ceasefire gave the Palestinians a chance at life again, after barbarity and brutality unparalleled in history, this should be the beginning of the road to reaching a final solution to the Palestinian issue. Perhaps the great lesson that we can learn from the war on Gaza is that what cannot be achieved by war can be achieved by peace and negotiation without costs that exceed the world’s ability to bear, as happened in Gaza.

The equation has changed in Syria, in Lebanon, and in many countries after the war on Gaza, but it is time for it to change as well in Palestine itself, which has remained for decades a factor of change in the political balances without changing itself. In order for the region to enter a new phase, there must be major concessions in the region, especially in Palestine and Israel. Perhaps US President Donald Trump is the most capable of pushing this deal forward, and this will indeed be the deal of the century that will reshape the world, not just the region.

The Saudi News Network first launched on Twitter via its official account, @SaudiNews50, and quickly became one of the Kingdom's leading independent news sources, thanks to its fast and reliable coverage of major local and international events. Due to the growing trust of its followers, the network expanded by launching its website, a comprehensive news platform offering regularly updated content in the fields of politics, economics, health, education, and national events, presented in a professional style that meets the public's expectations. The network strives to enhance public awareness and provide accurate information in a timely manner through on-the-ground reporting, in-depth analysis, and a specialized editorial team, making it a trusted source for anyone seeking up-to-the-minute Saudi news.

Politics

Britain imposes sanctions on Iranian officials over crackdown on protests

Britain announces new sanctions against 10 Iranian officials, including police and Revolutionary Guard commanders, in response to the crackdown on protesters. Learn more about the details and the implications of the decision.

Published

on

Britain imposes sanctions on Iranian officials over crackdown on protests

In a new escalation reflecting strained diplomatic relations between London and Tehran, the British government announced a package of tough sanctions targeting 10 prominent Iranian officials, as well as security entities, in response to what the United Kingdom described as "systematic violence" perpetrated by the authorities against protesters during the recent wave of protests in the country.

Details of the penalties and those covered by them

The new blacklist included high-ranking figures in the Iranian security and political hierarchy, most notably the Interior Minister and senior police commanders. The sanctions were not limited to individuals but also extended to the Iranian Law Enforcement Forces (FRAJA), considered the main arm responsible for dealing with protests on the ground.

The sanctions also targeted members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, a businessman linked to it, and two judges, indicating a British focus on the security, judicial, and economic systems that support repression. These sanctions include freezing the financial assets of those sanctioned within the United Kingdom, imposing a comprehensive travel ban, and preventing them from holding any administrative positions or engaging in any business activities that fall under British law.

The official British position

Commenting on these decisions, British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper affirmed that this step comes within the framework of the United Kingdom's commitment to holding those responsible for human rights violations accountable. Cooper praised what she described as the "remarkable courage" shown by the Iranian people in the face of the security apparatus, considering the sanctions a clear message against the "violent campaign of repression" being waged by the authorities in Tehran.

General context and international dimensions

These sanctions come at a time when Iran is facing significant internal challenges, including widespread protests demanding political and social reforms. The authorities have responded to these movements with harsh security measures, drawing widespread criticism from international human rights organizations and Western governments.

Observers believe that the British move is not an isolated incident, but rather part of a broader coordinated effort among Western countries (including the United States and the European Union) to increase Tehran's political and economic isolation. These coordinated actions aim to pressure the Iranian regime to change its behavior regarding human rights, as well as other contentious issues such as its nuclear program and its regional role.

These sanctions are expected to lead to further stagnation in bilateral relations between the two countries, as Tehran usually considers such measures to be blatant interference in its internal affairs, which may lead to reciprocal diplomatic actions and an escalation in political rhetoric between the two capitals in the coming period.

Continue Reading

Politics

Nuclear negotiations between Iran and the United States resume in Istanbul

Crucial nuclear negotiations between Iran and the United States have begun in Istanbul, with Saudi Arabia and Egypt in attendance, amid a US military buildup and demands for concessions to end the tension.

Published

on

Nuclear negotiations between Iran and the United States resume in Istanbul

In a diplomatic move aimed at defusing the escalating crisis in the Middle East, Iran and the United States are resuming their nuclear talks in Türkiye, amid widespread international and regional anticipation of the results of this crucial round.

Details of the meeting in Istanbul

Informed sources told Reuters that US Special Envoy Steve Wittkopf will hold a crucial meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi in Istanbul, Turkey. This meeting comes as part of intensive efforts to revive the long-stalled diplomatic process regarding Iran's nuclear program and to find common ground that would prevent a slide into open confrontation.

A diplomatic source in the region revealed that the talks will not be limited to the American and Iranian sides, but will also include representatives from influential regional powers, most notably Saudi Arabia and Egypt. The meetings are scheduled to be held at two levels: bilaterally between Washington and Tehran, and trilaterally with the regional parties, reflecting the desire of regional states to ensure that any future agreements take their security concerns into account.

Context of tension and military mobilization

These negotiations come at a highly sensitive time, as military tensions escalate in the Gulf. The talks coincide with a significant US naval buildup near Iranian territorial waters, a clear message of pressure from Washington. Meanwhile, Tehran faces unprecedented internal challenges, with the country experiencing what has been described as its most violent internal unrest since the 1979 revolution, further complicating the Iranian negotiating position.

US President Donald Trump insists that Iran must make substantial concessions regarding its nuclear program and regional activities, backing this demand with the deployment of a naval fleet to Iranian waters as a maximum pressure tactic. For his part, Ali Larijani, Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, confirmed that arrangements are underway for these negotiations, indicating Tehran's willingness to explore available diplomatic options.

Background of the crisis and the importance of negotiations

To understand the depth of these talks, one must consider the historical background of the nuclear issue. Since the United States withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal, in 2018, economic sanctions and a policy of "maximum pressure" have intensified, prompting Iran to gradually reduce its compliance with its nuclear commitments and increase its uranium enrichment levels. This situation has led to persistent instability in the region, punctuated by security incidents targeting maritime navigation and energy facilities.

This round of negotiations is of exceptional importance given its expected impact locally, regionally and internationally:

  • On a regional level: The presence of Saudi Arabia and Egypt represents a qualitative development, as the countries of the region seek to ensure the security of navigation in vital waterways and prevent a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.
  • On the international level: Global energy markets are closely monitoring these talks, as any easing of tensions would have a positive impact on the stability of oil prices and global supply chains.
  • On the domestic front: Any diplomatic breakthrough could help alleviate the economic sanctions that are burdening the Iranian economy and fueling internal unrest.

All eyes remain on Istanbul to see if last-minute diplomacy will succeed in sparing the region the horrors of a potential military conflict and establishing a new phase of security and political stability.

Continue Reading

Politics

Saudi Arabia offers condolences to Congo for the victims of the Rubaya mine collapse

The Kingdom expresses its solidarity with the Democratic Republic of Congo and offers condolences for the victims of the Rubaya mine collapse, which left more than 226 dead, affirming its support for the Congolese people.

Published

on

Saudi Arabia offers condolences to Congo for the victims of the Rubaya mine collapse

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia expressed its sincere condolences and heartfelt sympathy to the Democratic Republic of Congo, its leadership, government and people, for the tragic incident of the collapse of a mining mine in the city of Rubaya, located in the east of the country, which resulted in hundreds of victims and injuries in a humanitarian disaster that shook local and international circles.

In its official statement, the Kingdom affirmed its full support and solidarity with the Democratic Republic of Congo in this painful tragedy, expressing its hope that this ordeal will be overcome, and wishing safety and security for the friendly Congolese people, and mercy for the victims, whose number exceeded 226 workers, in a heavy toll that reflects the magnitude of the disaster that befell the region.

Details of the disaster and the mining context in Congo

This incident once again highlights the numerous risks facing the mining sector in the Democratic Republic of Congo, particularly in the mineral-rich eastern regions. Rubaya is a vital center for the extraction of strategic minerals such as coltan and manganese, but mining operations are often carried out using traditional (artisanal) methods that lack even the most basic occupational safety standards, leaving workers vulnerable to frequent landslides, especially during the rainy season when the soil becomes increasingly fragile.

Human and economic dimensions

Mine accidents in the Democratic Republic of Congo are a chronic challenge for the country, where a large part of the local economy and population depends on artisanal mining as a primary source of livelihood, despite the high risks. Observers point to the high number of casualties in the Rubaya accident as being due to severe overcrowding at the excavation sites and the poor infrastructure of the tunnels, which turned the site into a death trap immediately after the collapse.

The Kingdom's diplomatic and humanitarian role

The statement of condolence and solidarity issued by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia reflects its unwavering commitment to the principles of human fraternity and proactive diplomacy during times of crisis. The Kingdom consistently strives to extend bridges of communication and support to sisterly and friendly nations facing natural disasters and humanitarian crises, thereby reaffirming its leading role in strengthening international solidarity and bolstering the psychological and moral well-being of affected populations.

Continue Reading

Trending News