Culture and Art
Some intellectuals embrace a cause, while others abandon theirs
It is striking to anyone observing the cultural scene in our Arab world to see the diversity of intellectuals; between those who live for themselves and those who dedicate themselves and their efforts
It is striking to the observer of the cultural scene in our Arab world the diversity of intellectuals’ patterns; between those who live for themselves, those who dedicate themselves and their efforts to several causes, and those who try to combine a cause that they defend and adhere to, and give themselves their due of pleasure, comfort and enjoyment. To address the issue of the week through an elite group from our cultural and literary scene, we present what the weekly investigation has reached in terms of viewpoints on the issue of the intellectual at the public and private levels.
Writer Siham Hussein Al-Qahtani believes the question revolves around the concept of "intellectual authenticity." She argues that every intellectual must have a cause, embodied in a principle, methodology, and cultural vision. This, she asserts, is what grants them authenticity, both in terms of their ability to create a cultural trend and style, and in terms of their contribution to the cultural history of their society. She considers the fundamental nature of the cause to lie in its diverse manifestations, which do not imply uniformity but rather frame their cultural identity. Identity, she maintains, does not hinder diversity but rather contributes to expanding the scope of that cause through applications and methods. She sees this as an indicator of the intellectual's authenticity, as they adapt their personal cause to establish a comprehensive methodology. She cites the experiences of Al-Aroui and Al-Ghadhami, noting that the methodology derived from the intellectual's unique cultural identity is like a fingerprint, distinguishing them from others and extending their cultural impact.
The poet Khaled Qammash attributes the formal conflict between the intellectual and society to the problem of turning the intellectual into an issue in life, especially if the intellectual is able to produce creative ideas that provoke difference rather than conflict. He went on to say that the greatest common denominator among the issues of intellectuals is bias towards human concerns, victory for the truth, and fighting corruption and injustice. He added that the problem of some intellectuals lies in fabricating marginal issues that neither enrich nor satisfy hunger, in the hope of drawing attention to them after the lamps of their presence in the cultural scene have been extinguished!
He said: In a quick reading, if we exclude pragmatic intellectuals, the homeland and humanity remain the common axes for most cultural issues among some Arab intellectuals.
Dr. Hanan Anqawi, a theater expert, considers adopting a cause an integral part of the intellectual's sustainable development project. She believes that human progress in any part of the world is progress for the entire world, as the individual is part of their world. She emphasizes that a cause, for intellectuals and others alike, makes them feel their existence, fosters a sense of belonging to their own and the wider world, and reinforces their responsibilities towards themselves, their community, and the environment. She believes that intellectuals exist on different levels: some possess information and knowledge, some have a vision, and some are aware that they must have a cause connected to their being, their responsibilities, and their goals. She categorizes causes into levels: some contribute to growth, some develop capabilities, and some improve self-actualization through education and the accumulation of experience. The fruits of this cause benefit the society in which one lives and understands its needs, affirming the saying: "I have a cause, therefore I exist.".
The poet Abdulaziz Abu Lessa argued that the existence of a truly profound intellectual is an "issue" in itself, and is in fact an independent structure that needs to be deconstructed and introspected to explore its depths. Abu Lessa said: First, we must distinguish the intellectual from the pseudo-intellectual who lives off culture. Then, if we agree that the intellectual must detach himself from the lives that surround him and devote himself to his creative state, he will become isolated from his society and from what is around him. He believes that the intellectual, since he is a state that is identical with himself and with his society, will inevitably, consciously or unconsciously, not be separated from his affairs, which are necessarily part of the public affair, unless we talk about fantasy, the supernatural, and what is beyond human understanding.
Abdullah Al-Ghadhami: He who has no cause is a futile and parasitic appendix
Cultural critic Dr. Abdullah Al-Ghadhami asserts that the issue, for him, is not framed as a hypothetical, a duty, or a recommendation, but rather as something far greater than all such assumptions. He argues that a being without a cause cannot be a sound being, but rather a futile being, a mere appendix—to use medical terminology. He points out that every human being needs motivation through the concepts of what is obligatory and what is recommended. Only someone with a cause can truly be cultured, a worthy employee, or a farmer whose land yields bounty. The cultural critic added, "You and I are children of a generation that were farmers or merchants, and these are two of humanity's most profound professions. Farmers and merchants only succeed because they have a cause, the least of which is to live an honorable life for themselves and their families, thus avoiding the clutches of poverty." He concluded, "Woe to any self-proclaimed intellectual who claims to be cultured if they need to be reminded of what is obligatory and what is recommended." He added: Yes, there are reckless people who live in pleasure and care only about their own pleasure, but these people are not a measure of any meaning, and they remain a subject of research and reflection since they are abnormal.
Related News
Culture and Art
Mai Ezz El-Din leaves the hospital after delicate surgery: details of her health condition
Learn about the health condition of artist Mai Ezz El-Din after she left the hospital and underwent intestinal surgery, the doctors’ decision to ban visits, and Laila Elwi’s message to her.
In news that reassured her fans in Egypt and the Arab world, Egyptian star Mai Ezz El-Din the hospital and returned home after a difficult period spent there following a sudden health crisis that required emergency surgery. Well-informed medical sources confirmed that the actress's condition is showing significant improvement. However, the medical team stressed the importance of her complete recovery at home, with visits strictly prohibited at this time to ensure she is not exposed to any stress or infection that could hinder her recovery.
Details of the surgery and health crisis
The story began when the artist's husband, fitness trainer Ahmed Taymour , announced that his wife's health had deteriorated over the past few days. Taymour explained that Mai had been suffering from pain and health problems for some time, but things worsened rapidly in the last week, necessitating her immediate transfer to the hospital for thorough medical examinations. The results revealed an intestinal abscess that had caused pus formation, requiring urgent and delicate surgery to control the situation.
Following the surgery, Mai Ezz El-Din spent several days in the intensive care unit under close observation to ensure her vital functions were functioning properly and that the operation was a success, before doctors allowed her to leave to complete her treatment in a quiet home environment, with strict emphasis on complete rest.
Support from the artistic community and solidarity from colleagues
As is customary in the artistic community during crises, stars rushed to offer their colleague moral support. Among them was the renowned actress Laila Elwy , who posted a picture of Mai Ezz El-Din on her official Instagram account, along with a touching message reflecting the depth of their friendship and affection. Elwy wrote: "O God, grant her a complete and lasting recovery. O God, remove all her pain and suffering and clothe her in health and well-being. May God heal you, my dear Mai."
Mai Ezz El-Din's status and the impact of the news
This news has sparked concern among a wide segment of the Egyptian and Arab public, given Mai Ezz El-Din's immense popularity. Mai is one of the most prominent stars of her generation, having presented a collection of successful television and film works over many years that have left a clear mark on the history of modern Egyptian art. Her news always receives significant attention, which is why the news of her illness topped search engine results and social media platforms, with fans vying to pray for her speedy recovery.
The artist is expected to stay away from the spotlight and artistic activity for a temporary period until she fully recovers, in compliance with the instructions of the doctors who believe that psychological and physical comfort is the most important factor at this stage to overcome the effects of surgery and return to her audience in full force.
Culture and Art
Asmaa Jalal files a complaint against Ramez Jalal with the Public Prosecutor regarding the "Level of the Beast" program
Details of Asmaa Galal's complaint against Ramez Galal to the Public Prosecutor regarding the violations of the "Level of the Monster" program. Learn about the accusations leveled against Ramez Galal, including defamation, bullying, and suggestive remarks.
In a significant development within the Egyptian art scene, lawyer Nihad Abu El-Qomsan, representing actress Asmaa Galal, announced that she has taken formal legal action against Ramez Galal, the popular prank show host. An official complaint has been filed with the Attorney General regarding the content of the actress's episode on the show "Level of the Monster," which aired during last Ramadan. This move reopens the debate surrounding the excesses of Ramadan prank shows.
Details of the report and legal review
In an official statement issued by her office, Abu Al-Qumsan confirmed that the legal action was taken after a thorough review and complete transcription of the episode in question. She explained, "With reference to what has been circulating regarding an episode of the entertainment program, the office has transcribed the entire episode and reviewed it legally in light of the provisions of the Penal Code and the laws regulating media in Egypt." She indicated that the careful examination revealed violations that cannot be classified within the framework of artistic or entertainment work.
Accusations of slander, bullying, and verbal harassment
According to the complaint, the episode included repeated insults and personal attacks directed at the artist Asmaa Galal, as well as bullying comments and explicit sexual innuendo. The statement also noted that psychological pressure and coercion were exerted through questions about her private life, posed under duress during the prank. The lawyer emphasized that these actions were carried out publicly through a widely disseminated media outlet, thus removing them from the realm of humor and placing them within the scope of legally punishable offenses.
Context of prank shows and annual controversy
This incident comes amidst the recurring annual controversy surrounding Ramez Galal's programs. Over the years, these programs have achieved record viewership ratings both locally and regionally, yet they consistently spark sharp divisions. While some consider them essential Ramadan entertainment, others, including critics and media experts, believe they cross red lines regarding the dignity of guests and standards of psychological and physical safety. This complaint makes this latest episode in the series of legal challenges facing these types of programs.
Accepting the prank doesn't mean accepting the insult
Nihad Abu El-Qomsan emphasized a crucial legal point: an artist's initial agreement to participate in an entertainment or prank show does not, under any circumstances, constitute an open license to be subjected to insults or have their reputation and honor damaged. She clarified that any waiver of prosecution signed by a guest does not extend to actions criminalized under Egyptian law, nor does it prevent the initiation of criminal proceedings, as it is impermissible to agree to violate the law.
Impact of the incident on media standards
This legal action carries particular significance that transcends the personal dispute between the two parties, as it highlights the necessity for entertainment content creators to adhere to ethical and professional standards. The concluding statement emphasized artist Asmaa Jalal's complete respect for the media industry and its practitioners, affirming that resorting to the judiciary is a civilized means of establishing the professional and human boundaries that must be respected, and ensuring that artistic work is not confused with violations of privacy and human dignity.
Culture and Art
The Cashio family sues Michael Jackson for molestation: shocking details
Michael Jackson's second family has turned the tables, filing a lawsuit accusing him of sexual assault in the homes of Elizabeth Taylor and Elton John. Learn the details and the heirs' response.
In a shocking legal development that has reopened dark chapters of the past, four people who were considered for years to be among the closest confidants of the late pop star Michael Jackson have filed a lawsuit accusing him of rape and sexual abuse against them when they were children. The surprise lies not only in the nature of the accusations but also in the identity of the plaintiffs, who belong to the Cashcio family, often described in the media as Jackson's "second family," and who were his first line of defense for decades.
Details of the lawsuit and the alleged locations
The lawsuit, filed on February 27 by brothers Edward, Dominic, and Aldo Cacciu and their sister Marie Nicole Porte, contained harrowing details in a 23-page complaint. The plaintiffs described the late singer as a "serial child predator," alleging that he drugged and sexually abused them for over a decade, beginning in the 1990s when they were between seven and eight years old.
Perhaps the most controversial aspect of the lawsuit is the location of the alleged assaults. Besides the famous Neverland Ranch, Edward Cashio claimed to have been assaulted at Elizabeth Taylor's Swiss home and Elton John's UK home during stops on the Dangerous World Tour between 1992 and 1993. The lawsuit also mentioned assaults on Dominique in France and attempted assaults on sister Marie Nicole in multiple locations, including New York, Las Vegas, and even Bahrain during Jackson's stay there between 2005 and 2006. The lawsuit was careful to point out that Taylor and John were unaware of these alleged incidents in their homes.
A reversal in the family's historical position
This legal move marks a dramatic shift in the relationship between the Cashichion family and Michael Jackson's estate. Historically, members of this family have been cited as proof of Jackson's innocence, having lived and traveled with him for years. Brother Frank Cashichion even published a memoir in 2011 staunchly defending the "King of Pop" and denying any wrongdoing, making these current allegations a shock to the singer's fans and those following the legal proceedings surrounding his estate.
Legal context and impact of the case
This lawsuit adds to a series of legal challenges facing Michael Jackson's estate, bringing back memories of the infamous 2005 trial that ended with his acquittal on all child molestation charges after a five-month ordeal. Despite his death in 2009, Jackson's artistic legacy continues to face serious hurdles in the face of renewed accusations, which directly impact his global image and the artistic projects associated with his name.
The heirs' response: an attempt to extort money
For its part, Michael Jackson's estate responded firmly through attorney Marti Singer, who described the lawsuit as a "desperate attempt" to capitalize on the situation for financial gain. The defense statement revealed that family members had previously filed substantial financial claims, including a request for $213 million followed by another for $40 million, suggesting that this reversal of position after 25 years of staunch defense raises serious questions about the true motives behind the lawsuit.
-
Local News 3 days agoJeddah Airport alerts for travelers due to airspace closure and flight disruptions
-
Local News 5 days ago
Saudi Arabia approves regulations for the continued presence of Gulf vehicles: duration and penalties
-
Local news one week ago
The Ministry of Interior begins procedures for a royal pardon for common law prisoners
-
Local news one week ago
The deadline for property registration in Hail and Riyadh is Thursday
-
Sports one week ago
Tickets for the Al-Ahli vs. Al-Hilal King's Cup match postponed: New date
-
Local news one week ago
Under the patronage of the Minister of Information, an agreement was signed between the Ministry of Information and Waves Marketing Company
-
Culture and Art 6 days ago
The Devil's Prisons series was halted: The full story of "The Emperor's" being moved to YouTube
-
Local News 5 days ago
Saudi Energy: A new identity for electricity that aligns with Vision 2030
